» Articles » PMID: 38661544

Radiation Biological Toximetry Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) for Rapid Radiation/Nuclear Triage

Overview
Journal Radiat Res
Specialties Genetics
Radiology
Date 2024 Apr 25
PMID 38661544
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Optimal triage biodosimetry would include risk stratification within minutes, and it would provide useful triage despite heterogeneous dosimetry, cytokine therapy, mixed radiation quality, race, and age. For regulatory approval, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biodosimetry Guidance requires suitability for purpose and a validated species-independent mechanism. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration assays may provide such triage information. To test this hypothesis, cfDNA concentrations were measured in unprocessed monkey plasma using a branched DNA (bDNA) technique with a laboratory developed test. The cfDNA levels, along with hematopoietic parameters, were measured over a 7-day period in Rhesus macaques receiving total body radiation doses ranging from 1 to 6.5 Gy. Low-dose irradiation (0-2 Gy) was easily distinguished from high-dose whole-body exposures (5.5 and 6.5 Gy). Fold changes in cfDNA in the monkey model were comparable to those measured in a bone marrow transplant patient receiving a supralethal radiation dose, suggesting that the lethal threshold of cfDNA concentrations may be similar across species. Average cfDNA levels were 50 ± 40 ng/mL [±1 standard deviation (SD)] pre-irradiation, 120 ± 13 ng/mL at 1 Gy; 242 ± 71 ng/mL at 2 Gy; 607 ± 54 at 5.5 Gy; and 1585 ± 351 at 6.5 Gy (±1 SD). There was an exponential increase in cfDNA concentration with radiation dose. Comparison of the monkey model with the mouse model and the Guskova model, developed using Chernobyl responder data, further demonstrated correlation across species, supporting a similar mechanism of action. The test is available commercially in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) ready form in the U.S. and the European Union. The remaining challenges include developing methods for further simplification of specimen processing and assay evaluation, as well as more accurate calibration of the triage category with cfDNA concentration cutoffs.

References
1.
Zhang M, Yang S, Cao Y, Bingrong Zhang S, Yin L, Tian Y . A new biodosimetric method: branched DNA-based quantitative detection of B1 DNA in mouse plasma. Br J Radiol. 2010; 83(992):694-701. PMC: 3473514. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/49886569. View

2.
Lockney N, Henderson R, Swarts S, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Li J . Measuring Radiation Toxicity Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Prostate Cancer Patients. Int J Part Ther. 2022; 8(3):28-35. PMC: 8768895. DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-D-21-00008. View

3.
Lockney N, Henderson R, Swarts S, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Li J . Circulating Cell-Free DNA Correlates with Body Integral Dose and Radiation Modality in Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2020; 7(2):21-30. PMC: 7707322. DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00033.1. View

4.
Kinoshita A, Baffa O, Mascarenhas S . Electron spin resonance (ESR) dose measurement in bone of Hiroshima A-bomb victim. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192444. PMC: 5800652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192444. View

5.
Hu P, Liang D, Chen Y, Lin Y, Qiao F, Li H . An enrichment method to increase cell-free fetal DNA fraction and significantly reduce false negatives and test failures for non-invasive prenatal screening: a feasibility study. J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1):124. PMC: 6460836. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1871-x. View