» Articles » PMID: 38660432

The Effect of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills on Learning and Satisfaction of Students in Community Dentistry Course

Overview
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Apr 25
PMID 38660432
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Direct Observation of Practical Skills (DOPS) tests is a valuable method for clinical assessment. This study aimed to implement the DOPS test to assess the procedural skills of community dentistry courses and its effects on mastery learning and satisfaction of professors and students at Tabriz faculty of dentistry in 2021-2022.

Methods: In a quasi-experimental study, 60 dentistry students of a class were assigned into two study (n=30) and control (n=30) groups by Permuted block randomization. In the case group, the skills were related to Fluoride therapy, fissure sealant therapy, and health education evaluated by DOPS. In the control group, these skills were evaluated by traditional evaluation methods. Each test was repeated three times. Finally, the satisfaction of students in the case group was assessed by a questionnaire. The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare the mean scores in three stages and two groups. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software.

Results: A significant difference in the mean score of Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education was seen between the case and control groups (P<0.001). Also a significant increase in these skills in the third stage of assessment in the case group was observed (P<0.001). The professors and students' satisfaction was considerably high on the DOPS test.

Conclusion: The DOPS method had more impact on Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education's learning process in dentistry students than the conventional evaluation. The professors and students' satisfaction level was high regarding DOPS. The advantages of the DOPS method are student-centeredness, objectivity, and appropriate feedback.

References
1.
Lagoo J, Joshi S . Introduction of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) as a formative assessment tool during postgraduate training in anaesthesiology: Exploration of perceptions. Indian J Anaesth. 2021; 65(3):202-209. PMC: 7989495. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_124_20. View

2.
Farajpour A, Amini M, Pishbin E, Mostafavian Z, Farmad S . Using Modified Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) to assess undergraduate medical students. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018; 6(3):130-136. PMC: 6039823. View

3.
Profanter C, Perathoner A . DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) in undergraduate skills-lab: Does it work? Analysis of skills-performance and curricular side effects. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015; 32(4):Doc45. PMC: 4606486. DOI: 10.3205/zma000987. View

4.
Malau-Aduli B, Jones K, Saad S, Richmond C . Has the OSCE Met Its Final Demise? Rebalancing Clinical Assessment Approaches in the Peri-Pandemic World. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:825502. PMC: 8899088. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825502. View

5.
Jasemi M, Ahangarzadeh Rezaie S, Hemmati Maslakpak M, Parizad N . Are workplace-based assessment methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) effective in nursing students' clinical skills? A single-blind randomized, parallel group, controlled trial. Contemp Nurse. 2020; 55(6):565-575. DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2020.1735941. View