» Articles » PMID: 38659834

Neurophysiological and Autonomic Dynamics of Threat Processing During Sustained Social Fear Generalization

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Apr 25
PMID 38659834
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Survival in dynamic environments requires that organisms learn to predict danger from situational cues. One key facet of threat prediction is generalization from a predictive cue to similar cues, ensuring that a cue-outcome contingency is applied beyond the original learning environment. Generalization has been observed in laboratory studies of aversive conditioning: behavioral and physiological processes generalize responses from a stimulus paired with threat (the CS+) to unpaired stimuli, with response magnitudes varying with CS+ similarity. In contrast, work focusing on sensory responses in visual cortex has found a sharpening pattern, in which responses to stimuli closely resembling the CS+ are maximally suppressed, potentially reflecting lateral inhibitory interactions with the CS+ representation. Originally demonstrated with simple visual cues, changes in visuocortical tuning have also been observed in threat generalization learning across facial identities. It is unclear to what extent these visuocortical changes represent transient or sustained effects and if generalization learning requires prior conditioning to the CS+. The present study addressed these questions using EEG and pupillometry in an aversive generalization paradigm involving hundreds of trials using a gradient of facial identities. Visuocortical ssVEP sharpening occurred after dozens of trials of generalization learning without prior differential conditioning, but diminished as learning continued. By contrast, generalization of alpha power suppression, pupil dilation, and self-reported valence and arousal was seen throughout the experiment. Findings are consistent with threat processing models emphasizing the role of changing visucocortical and attentional dynamics when forming, curating, and shaping fear memories as observers continue learning about stimulus-outcome contingencies.

References
1.
DI Russo F, Pitzalis S, Aprile T, Spitoni G, Patria F, Stella A . Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006; 28(4):323-34. PMC: 6871301. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20276. View

2.
Antov M, Plog E, Bierwirth P, Keil A, Stockhorst U . Visuocortical tuning to a threat-related feature persists after extinction and consolidation of conditioned fear. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3926. PMC: 7054355. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60597-z. View

3.
Lissek S, Kaczkurkin A, Rabin S, Geraci M, Pine D, Grillon C . Generalized anxiety disorder is associated with overgeneralization of classically conditioned fear. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 75(11):909-15. PMC: 3938992. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.025. View

4.
Peyk P, De Cesarei A, Junghofer M . ElectroMagnetoEncephalography software: overview and integration with other EEG/MEG toolboxes. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:861705. PMC: 3090751. DOI: 10.1155/2011/861705. View

5.
Wieser M, Miskovic V, Keil A . Steady-state visual evoked potentials as a research tool in social affective neuroscience. Psychophysiology. 2016; 53(12):1763-1775. PMC: 5582350. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12768. View