» Articles » PMID: 38658891

Retrospective Analysis of the Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasm and Malignancy in Patients Treated for Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Overview
Journal BMC Surg
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Apr 24
PMID 38658891
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis is currently being promoted as treatment option, albeit 0.7-2.5% of appendectomies performed due to suspected acute appendicitis show histologically malignant findings. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of neoplasm and malignancy of the appendix in patients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis in real world setting.

Methods: This is a retrospective single-centre investigation of 457 patients undergoing appendectomy between the years 2017-2020. The patients' demographics, symptoms and diagnosis, intraoperative findings, and histopathological results were analysed.

Results: In 3.7% (n = 17) histological analysis revealed neoplasms or malignancies. Median age was 48 years (20-90 years), without sex predominance. Leukocytes (11.3 ± 3.7 G/l) and C-reactive protein (54.2 ± 69.0 mg/l) were elevated. Histological analysis revealed low-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasia (n = 3), sessile serrated adenoma of the appendix (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumours (n = 7), appendiceal adenocarcinoma of intestinal type (n = 3), and goblet cell carcinoma (n = 1). Additional treatment varied between no treatment or follow-up due to early tumour stage (n = 4), follow-up care (n = 3), additional surgical treatment (n = 8), or best supportive care (n = 2).

Conclusions: Preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal tumours is difficult. Nonoperative management of patients with acute, uncomplicated appendicitis potentially prevents the correct diagnosis of malignant appendiceal pathologies. Therefore, close follow-up or surgical removal of the appendix is mandatory.

References
1.
Mallinen J, Rautio T, Gronroos J, Rantanen T, Nordstrom P, Savolainen H . Risk of Appendiceal Neoplasm in Periappendicular Abscess in Patients Treated With Interval Appendectomy vs Follow-up With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1-Year Outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2018; 154(3):200-207. PMC: 6439633. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4373. View

2.
Roberts J, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J . Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008; 16(4):386-90. DOI: 10.1177/1066896908315746. View

3.
Paterson H, Qadan M, de Luca S, Nixon S, Paterson-Brown S . Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2007; 95(3):363-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5961. View

4.
Rossi A, Maloney Patel N . Appendiceal neoplasms-A practical guide. J Surg Oncol. 2023; 127(8):1300-1305. DOI: 10.1002/jso.27304. View

5.
Marudanayagam R, Williams G, Rees B . Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006; 41(8):745-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-006-1855-5. View