» Articles » PMID: 38658857

Long-read Sequencing of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA and Genome Assembly of a Solanum Lycopersicum Breeding Line Revealed Active LTR Retrotransposons Originating from S. Peruvianum L. Introgressions

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2024 Apr 24
PMID 38658857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are a major force in the evolution of plant genomes. Differences in the transposition activities and landscapes of TEs can vary substantially, even in closely related species. Interspecific hybridization, a widely employed technique in tomato breeding, results in the creation of novel combinations of TEs from distinct species. The implications of this process for TE transposition activity have not been studied in modern cultivars. In this study, we used nanopore sequencing of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) and identified two highly active Ty1/Copia LTR retrotransposon families of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), called Salsa and Ketchup. Elements of these families produce thousands of eccDNAs under controlled conditions and epigenetic stress. EccDNA sequence analysis revealed that the major parts of eccDNA produced by Ketchup and Salsa exhibited low similarity to the S. lycopersicum genomic sequence. To trace the origin of these TEs, whole-genome nanopore sequencing and de novo genome assembly were performed. We found that these TEs occurred in a tomato breeding line via interspecific introgression from S. peruvianum. Our findings collectively show that interspecific introgressions can contribute to both genetic and phenotypic diversity not only by introducing novel genetic variants, but also by importing active transposable elements from other species.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of Active LTR Retrotransposons in Sunflower ( L.): From Extrachromosomal Circular DNA Detection to Protein Structure Prediction.

Kazancev M, Merkulov P, Tiurin K, Demurin Y, Soloviev A, Kirov I Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769378 PMC: 11728184. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413615.

References
1.
Jain C, Rodriguez-R L, Phillippy A, Konstantinidis K, Aluru S . High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):5114. PMC: 6269478. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. View

2.
Wang H, Tian Q, Ma Y, Wu Y, Miao G, Ma Y . Transpositional reactivation of two LTR retrotransposons in rice-Zizania recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Hereditas. 2010; 147(6):264-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2010.02181.x. View

3.
Yang F, Su W, Chung O, Tracy L, Wang L, Ramsden D . Retrotransposons hijack alt-EJ for DNA replication and eccDNA biogenesis. Nature. 2023; 620(7972):218-225. PMC: 10691919. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06327-7. View

4.
Dubin M, Mittelsten Scheid O, Becker C . Transposons: a blessing curse. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018; 42:23-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.01.003. View

5.
Feschotte C, Jiang N, Wessler S . Plant transposable elements: where genetics meets genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3(5):329-41. DOI: 10.1038/nrg793. View