» Articles » PMID: 38655455

Effectiveness of Multimodal Participant Recruitment in SPARK, a Large, Online Longitudinal Research Study of Autism

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 24
PMID 38655455
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: SPARK launched in 2016 to build a US cohort of autistic individuals and their family members. Enrollment includes online consent to share data and optional consent to provide saliva for genomic analysis. SPARK's recruitment strategies include social media and support of a nation-wide network of clinical sites. This study evaluates SPARK's recruitment strategies to enroll a core study population.

Methods: Individuals who joined between January 31, 2018, and May 29, 2019 were included in the analysis. Data include sociodemographic characteristics, clinical site referral, the website URL used to join, how the participant heard about SPARK, enrollment completion (online registration, study consents, and returning saliva sample), and completion of the baseline questionnaire. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the odds of core participant status (completing enrollment and baseline questionnaire) by recruitment strategy.

Results: In total, 31,715 individuals joined during the study period, including 40% through a clinical site. Overall, 88% completed online registration, 46% returned saliva, and 38% were core participants. Those referred by a clinical site were almost twice as likely to be core participants. Those who directly visited the SPARK website or performed a Google search were more likely to be core participants than those who joined through social media.

Discussion: Being a core participant may be associated with the "personal" connection and support provided by a clinical site and/or site staff, as well as greater motivation to seek research opportunities. Findings from this study underscore the value of adopting a multimodal recruitment approach that combines social media and a physical presence.

Citing Articles

Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel's and research participants' perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort.

Goin-Kochel R, Lozano I, Duhon G, Marzano G, Daniels A, Law J J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e65.

PMID: 38690223 PMC: 11058577. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.512.

References
1.
Parker J, Hunter A, Bauermeister J, Bonar E, Carrico A, Stephenson R . Comparing Social Media and In-Person Recruitment: Lessons Learned From Recruiting Substance-Using, Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Young Adults for a Randomized Control Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021; 7(12):e31657. PMC: 8686481. DOI: 10.2196/31657. View

2.
Brogger-Mikkelsen M, Ali Z, Zibert J, Andersen A, Thomsen S . Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e22179. PMC: 7673977. DOI: 10.2196/22179. View

3.
Cunningham-Erves J, Joosten Y, Kusnoor S, Mayers S, Ichimura J, Dunkel L . A community-informed recruitment plan template to increase recruitment of racial and ethnic groups historically excluded and underrepresented in clinical research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022; 125:107064. PMC: 9926351. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107064. View

4.
Haikerwal A, Doyle L, Patton G, Wark J, Garland S, Burnett A . Using Facebook to Improve Participation Among 25-Year-Olds Enrolled in a Longitudinal Preterm Birth Cohort Study. Acad Pediatr. 2020; 20(7):1029-1036. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.01.008. View

5.
Fombonne E, Coppola L, Mastel S, ORoak B . Validation of Autism Diagnosis and Clinical Data in the SPARK Cohort. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021; 52(8):3383-3398. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-021-05218-y. View