» Articles » PMID: 38654967

Deep Learning and Capsule Endoscopy: Automatic Multi-brand and Multi-device Panendoscopic Detection of Vascular Lesions

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is commonly used as the initial exam for suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding after normal upper and lower endoscopy. Although the assessment of the small bowel is the primary focus of CE, detecting upstream or downstream vascular lesions may also be clinically significant. This study aimed to develop and test a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model for panendoscopic automatic detection of vascular lesions during CE. A multicentric AI model development study was based on 1022 CE exams. Our group used 34655 frames from seven types of CE devices, of which 11091 were considered to have vascular lesions (angiectasia or varices) after triple validation. We divided data into a training and a validation set, and the latter was used to evaluate the model's performance. At the time of division, all frames from a given patient were assigned to the same dataset. Our primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR). Sensitivity and specificity were 86.4% and 98.3%, respectively. PPV was 95.2%, while the NPV was 95.0%. Overall accuracy was 95.0%. The AUC-PR value was 0.96. The CNN processed 115 frames per second. This is the first proof-of-concept artificial intelligence deep learning model developed for pan-endoscopic automatic detection of vascular lesions during CE. The diagnostic performance of this CNN in multi-brand devices addresses an essential issue of technological interoperability, allowing it to be replicated in multiple technological settings.

References
1.
Saurin J, Delvaux M, Gaudin J, Fassler I, Villarejo J, Vahedi K . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(7):576-84. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40244. View

2.
Cortegoso Valdivia P, Elosua A, Houdeville C, Pennazio M, Fernandez-Urien I, Dray X . Clinical feasibility of panintestinal (or panenteric) capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 33(7):949-955. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002200. View

3.
Marmo R, Rotondano G, Rondonotti E, De Franchis R, DInca R, Vettorato M . Capsule enteroscopy vs. other diagnostic procedures in diagnosing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a cost-effectiveness study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 19(7):535-42. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32812144dd. View

4.
Noya F, Alvarez-Gonzalez M, Benitez R . Automated angiodysplasia detection from wireless capsule endoscopy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017; 2017:3158-3161. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037527. View

5.
Mascarenhas M, Ribeiro T, Afonso J, Ferreira J, Cardoso H, Andrade P . Deep learning and colon capsule endoscopy: automatic detection of blood and colonic mucosal lesions using a convolutional neural network. Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10(2):E171-E177. PMC: 8850002. DOI: 10.1055/a-1675-1941. View