» Articles » PMID: 38653510

Willingness and Preferences for Long-acting Injectable PrEP Among US Men Who Have Sex with Men: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 23
PMID 38653510
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) was shown to be safe and effective in multiple clinical trials. Increasing uptake and persistence among populations with elevated risk for HIV acquisition, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM), is critical to HIV prevention.

Objective: This analysis aims to understand potential users' preferences for LA-PrEP, with audience segmentation.

Design: Willingness to use and preferences for LA-PrEP were measured in HIV-negative, sexually active MSM in the 2020 American Men's Internet Survey. Respondents answered a discrete choice experiment with paired profiles of hypothetical LA-PrEP characteristics with an opt-out option (no LA-PrEP). Conditional and mixed logit models were run; the final model was a dummy-coded mixed logit that interacted with the opt-out.

Setting: US national online sample.

Results: Among 2506 MSM respondents, most (75%) indicated a willingness to use LA-PrEP versus daily oral PrEP versus no PrEP. Respondents were averse to side effects and increasing costs and preferred increasing levels of protection. Respondents preferred a 2-hour time to obtain LA-PrEP vs 1 hour, with a strong aversion to 3 hours. Overall, there was an aversion to opting out of LA-PrEP, with variations: those with only one partner, no/other insurance or who were Black, Indigenous or People of Colour were significantly less likely to prefer LA-PrEP, while those who were Hispanic/Latino, college educated and <40 years significantly preferred LA-PrEP.

Conclusions: A large proportion of MSM expressed a preference for LA-PrEP over daily oral pills. Most respondents chose LA-PrEP regardless of cost, clinic time, side effects or protection level; however, preferences varied by sociodemographics. These varied groups likely require tailored intervention strategies to achieve maximum LA-PrEP uptake and persistence.

Citing Articles

Brief communication: attitudes and preferences of long-acting injectable HIV preexposure prophylaxis among Thai adolescents and young adults.

Wongsethanatada A, Songtaweesin W, Wongharn P, Moonwong J, Khamthi S, Pitikawinwong L AIDS Res Ther. 2025; 22(1):28.

PMID: 40025583 PMC: 11872299. DOI: 10.1186/s12981-025-00721-z.


Exploring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) modality preferences among black cisgender women attending family planning clinics in Chicago via a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.

Johnson A, Ott E, Friedman E, Pandiani A, Moore A, Alvarez I BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e000809.

PMID: 40017987 PMC: 11812854. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000809.


Willingness to Use Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Kampala, Uganda.

Lunkuse J, Lwanga C, Wamono F, Muturi-Kioi V, Price M, Mayanja Y AIDS Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 39883369 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-025-04616-y.


Recruitment of Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men for a Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intervention: Differences in Participant Characteristics and Study Engagement by Recruitment Source in a Randomized Controlled....

Marshall D, Gower A, Katz M, Bauermeister J, Shoben A, Reiter P J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e64668.

PMID: 39752644 PMC: 11748433. DOI: 10.2196/64668.


Preferences for Starting Daily, On-Demand, and Long-Acting Injectable HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States (2021-2022): Nationwide Online Cross-Sectional Study.

Islek D, Sanchez T, Glick J, Jones J, Rawlings K, Sarkar S JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10():e62801.

PMID: 39536313 PMC: 11602762. DOI: 10.2196/62801.

References
1.
Hauber A, Gonzalez J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Prior T, Marshall D, Cunningham C . Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016; 19(4):300-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. View

2.
Maxwell S, Gafos M, Shahmanesh M . Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use and Medication Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2019; 30(4):e38-e61. DOI: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000105. View

3.
Macapagal K, Nery-Hurwit M, Matson M, Crosby S, Greene G . Perspectives on and preferences for on-demand and long-acting PrEP among sexual and gender minority adolescents assigned male at birth. Sex Res Social Policy. 2021; 18(1):39-53. PMC: 7810244. DOI: 10.1007/s13178-020-00441-1. View

4.
Martinez O, Levine E, Munoz-Laboy M, Carballo-Dieguez A, Bauermeister J, Chacon A . More than just oral PrEP: exploring interest in rectal douche, dissolvable implant, removable implant and injection HIV prevention approaches among racially diverse men who have sex with men in the Northeast Corridor. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(8):e063474. PMC: 9394203. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063474. View

5.
Muhlbacher A, Bridges J, Bethge S, Dintsios C, Schwalm A, Gerber-Grote A . Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2016; 18(2):155-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0763-8. View