» Articles » PMID: 38650182

Understanding the Promoting Effect of Non-catalytic Protein on Enzymatic Hydrolysis Efficiency of Lignocelluloses

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2024 Apr 23
PMID 38650182
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lignin deposits formed on the surface of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates during acidic pretreatments can non-productively adsorb costly enzymes and thereby influence the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of cellulose. In this article, peanut protein (PP), a biocompatible non-catalytic protein, was separated from defatted peanut flour (DPF) as a lignin blocking additive to overcome this adverse effect. With the addition of 2.5 g/L PP in enzymatic hydrolysis medium, the glucose yield of the bamboo substrate pretreated by phenylsulfonic acid (PSA) significantly increased from 38 to 94% at a low cellulase loading of 5 FPU/g glucan while achieving a similar glucose yield required a cellulase loading of 17.5 FPU/g glucan without PP addition. Similar promotion effects were also observed on the n-pentanol-pretreated bamboo and PSA-pretreated eucalyptus substrates. The promoting effect of PP on enzymatic hydrolysis was ascribed to blocking lignin deposits via hydrophobic and/or hydrogen-bonding interactions, which significantly reduced the non-productive adsorption of cellulase onto PSA lignin. Meanwhile, PP extraction also facilitated the utilization of residual DPF as the adhesive for producing plywood as compared to that without protein pre-extraction. This scheme provides a sustainable and viable way to improve the value of woody and agriculture biomass. Peanut protein, a biocompatible non-catalytic protein, can block lignin, improve enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency and thereby facilitate the economics of biorefinery.

Citing Articles

Coproduction of xylo-oligosaccharides and glucose from sugarcane bagasse in subcritical CO-assisted seawater system.

Zhang L, Zhang X, Lei F, Jiang J, Ji L Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 9(1):34.

PMID: 38647821 PMC: 10991134. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-022-00525-3.


Surfactants, Biosurfactants, and Non-Catalytic Proteins as Key Molecules to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass.

Sanchez-Munoz S, Balbino T, de Oliveira F, Rocha T, Barbosa F, Velez-Mercado M Molecules. 2022; 27(23).

PMID: 36500273 PMC: 9739445. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27238180.


Polystyrene sulfonate is effective for enhancing biomass enzymatic saccharification under green liquor pretreatment in bioenergy poplar.

Liu T, Wang P, Tian J, Guo J, Zhu W, Jin Y Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022; 15(1):10.

PMID: 35418140 PMC: 8783513. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02108-y.


Using poly(N-Vinylcaprolactam) to Improve the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Efficiency of Phenylsulfonic Acid-Pretreated Bamboo.

Lv X, Yang G, Gong Z, Cheng X, Shuai L, Huang L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:804456.

PMID: 34917604 PMC: 8668804. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.804456.

References
1.
Qin C, Clarke K, Li K . Interactive forces between lignin and cellulase as determined by atomic force microscopy. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014; 7:65. PMC: 4021820. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-65. View

2.
Florencio C, Badino A, Farinas C . Soybean protein as a cost-effective lignin-blocking additive for the saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 221:172-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.039. View

3.
Lai C, Yang B, Lin Z, Jia Y, Huang C, Li X . New strategy to elucidate the positive effects of extractable lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019; 12:57. PMC: 6423845. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1402-2. View

4.
Donohoe B, Decker S, Tucker M, Himmel M, Vinzant T . Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008; 101(5):913-25. DOI: 10.1002/bit.21959. View

5.
Zheng L, Zhao Y, Xiao C, Sun-Waterhouse D, Zhao M, Su G . Mechanism of the discrepancy in the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency between defatted peanut flour and peanut protein isolate by Flavorzyme. Food Chem. 2014; 168:100-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.037. View