Utilizing Maternal Healthcare Services: Are Female-headed Households Faring Poorly?

Overview

Journal BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Apr 22

PMID 38649989

Authors

Subhasree Ghatak

Meghna Dutta

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Utilization of maternal healthcare services has a direct bearing on maternal mortality but is contingent on a wide range of socioeconomic factors, including the sex of the household head. This paper studies the role of the sex of the household head in the utilization of maternal healthcare services in India using data from the National Family Health Survey-V (2019-2021).

Methods: The outcome variable of this study is maternal healthcare service utilization. To that end, we consider three types of maternal healthcare services: antenatal care, skilled birth assistance, and postnatal care to measure the utilization of maternal healthcare service utilization. The explanatory variable is the sex of the household head and we control for specific characteristics at the individual level, household-head level, household level and spouse level. We then incorporate a bivariate logistic regression on the variables of interest.

Results: 24.25% of women from male-headed households have complete utilization of maternal healthcare services while this proportion for women from female-headed households stands at 22.39%. The results from the bivariate logistic regression confirm the significant impact that the sex of the household head has on the utilization of maternal healthcare services in India. It is observed that women from female-headed households in India are 19% (AOR, 0.81; 95% CI: 0.63,1.03) less likely to utilize these services than those from male-headed households. Moreover with higher levels of education, there is a 25% (AOR, 1.25; 95% CI: 1.08,1.44) greater likelihood of utilizing maternal healthcare services. Residence in urban areas, improved wealth quintiles and access to healthcare facilities significantly increases the chances of maternal healthcare utilization. The interaction term between the sex of the household head and the wealth quintile the household belongs to, (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89) shows that the utilization of maternal healthcare services improves when the wealth quintile of the household improves.

Conclusion: The results throw light on the fact that the added expenditure on maternal healthcare services exacerbates the existing financial burden for the economically vulnerable female-headed households. This necessitates the concentration of research and policy attention to alleviate these households from the sexual and reproductive health distresses.

Trial Registration: Not Applicable.

Jel Classification: D10, I12, J16.

Citing Articles

Tesfie T, Yirsaw B, Agimas M, Merid M, Derseh N, Tilahun W PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309247.

PMID: 39186483 PMC: 11346657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309247.

References

Hamal M, Dieleman M, De Brouwere V, de Cock Buning T . Social determinants of maternal health: a scoping review of factors influencing maternal mortality and maternal health service use in India. Public Health Rev. 2020; 41:13. PMC: 7265229. DOI: 10.1186/s40985-020-00125-6. View

Raghupathy S . Education and the use of maternal health care in Thailand. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43(4):459-71. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00411-4. View

Bain L, Aboagye R, Dowou R, Kongnyuy E, Memiah P, Amu H . Prevalence and determinants of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: cross-sectional analyses of demographic and health survey data. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):647. PMC: 8981812. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13037-8. View

Streatfield K, Singarimbun M, Diamond I . Maternal education and child immunization. Demography. 1990; 27(3):447-55. View

Pebley A, Goldman N, Rodriguez G . Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: do family and community matter?. Demography. 1996; 33(2):231-47. View

Yaya S, Uthman O, Amouzou A, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G . Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Benin: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):194. PMC: 5984297. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1846-6. View

Karlsen S, Say L, Souza J, Hogue C, Calles D, Gulmezoglu A . The relationship between maternal education and mortality among women giving birth in health care institutions: analysis of the cross sectional WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:606. PMC: 3162526. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-606. View

Ghosh A, Ghosh R . Maternal health care in India: A reflection of 10 years of National Health Mission on the Indian maternal health scenario. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020; 25:100530. DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100530. View

Pandey S, Karki S . Socio-economic and Demographic Determinants of Antenatal Care Services Utilization in Central Nepal. Int J MCH AIDS. 2016; 2(2):212-9. PMC: 4948147. View

10.

Sanogo N, Yaya S . Wealth Status, Health Insurance, and Maternal Health Care Utilization in Africa: Evidence from Gabon. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:4036830. PMC: 7212326. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4036830. View

11.

Moinuddin M, Christou A, Hoque D, Tahsina T, Salam S, Billah S . Birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) among pregnant women in hard-to-reach areas in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0189365. PMC: 5724858. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189365. View

12.

Sharma A, Khapre M, Meshram R, Gupta A . Determinants of utilization of antenatal care services among recently delivered women residing in urban poor areas of Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India-a cross-sectional study. J Rural Med. 2023; 18(2):87-95. PMC: 10079463. DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2022-030. View

13.

Rosenfield A, Charo R, Chavkin W . Moving forward on reproductive health. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(18):1869-71. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0806807. View

14.

Leone T, James K, Padmadas S . The burden of maternal health care expenditure in India: multilevel analysis of national data. Matern Child Health J. 2012; 17(9):1622-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1174-9. View

15.

Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Campbell O, Graham W, Mills A, Borghi J . Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. Lancet. 2006; 368(9546):1535-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69384-7. View

16.

Okedo-Alex I, Akamike I, Ezeanosike O, Uneke C . Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(10):e031890. PMC: 6797296. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031890. View

17.

Ronsmans C, Graham W . Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1189-200. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X. View

18.

Wang W, Temsah G, Mallick L . The impact of health insurance on maternal health care utilization: evidence from Ghana, Indonesia and Rwanda. Health Policy Plan. 2017; 32(3):366-375. PMC: 5400062. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw135. View

19.

Hailu M, Gebremariam A, Alemseged F, Deribe K . Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Southern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e21432. PMC: 3120869. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021432. View

20.

Rizkianti A, Afifah T, Saptarini I, Rakhmadi M . Women's decision-making autonomy in the household and the use of maternal health services: An Indonesian case study. Midwifery. 2020; 90:102816. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816. View