» Articles » PMID: 38648778

Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in 260 Patients with Lupus Nephritis: Analysis of a Nationwide Multicentre Cohort with Up to 35 Years of Follow-up

Abstract

Objectives: To compare proliferative (PLN) and membranous (MLN) lupus nephritis (LN) regarding clinical and laboratory presentation and long-term outcomes, and to investigate predictors of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: Multicentre observational study, with retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort, using data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry - Reuma.pt. Patients with biopsy-proven PLN, MLN and mixed LN were included. Cox regression survival analysis was used to investigate predictors of CKD.

Results: A total of 260 patients were included. Median follow-up was 8 years (IQR 11; minimum 1, maximum 35 years). MLN patients presented with significantly lower serum creatinine [0.70 (IQR 0.20; minimum 0.50, maximum 1.30) mg/dl vs 0.80 (IQR 0.31; minimum 0.26, maximum 2.60) in PLN, P = 0.003]. Proteinuria levels did not differ between groups (P = 0.641). Levels of complement were reduced in PLN but nearly normal in MLN patients, and there were fewer patients with positive anti-dsDNA antibodies in the MLN group (P < 0.001). One year after the beginning of treatment, 62% of the patients achieved EULAR/ERA-EDTA complete response, with a further 5% achieving partial response. Patients with lower proteinuria at diagnosis were more likely to achieve a complete renal response at one year; however, proteinuria at diagnosis or at one year did not predict long-term CKD. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤75 mL/min/1.73 m2 at one year was the strongest predictor of progression to CKD (HR 23 [95% CI 8-62], P < 0.001). Other possible predictors included the use of azathioprine for induction of remission, older age at diagnosis and male sex.

Conclusion: Proteinuria levels did not predict LN histologic class in our cohort. eGFR cutoff of 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 after one year of treatment was strongly predictive of progression to CKD.

References
1.
Ahn S, Yoo J, Jung S, Song J, Park Y, Lee S . Comparison of clinical features and outcomes between patients with early and delayed lupus nephritis. BMC Nephrol. 2020; 21(1):258. PMC: 7341643. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01915-5. View

2.
Ikeuchi H, Sugiyama H, Sato H, Yokoyama H, Maruyama S, Mukoyama M . A nationwide analysis of renal and patient outcomes for adults with lupus nephritis in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2022; 26(9):898-908. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-022-02232-x. View

3.
Farinha F, Pepper R, Oliveira D, McDonnell T, Isenberg D, Rahman A . Outcomes of membranous and proliferative lupus nephritis - analysis of a single-centre cohort with more than 30 years of follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020; 59(11):3314-3323. PMC: 7590413. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa103. View

4.
Hanly J, OKeeffe A, Su L, Urowitz M, Romero-Diaz J, Gordon C . The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 55(2):252-62. PMC: 4939728. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev311. View

5.
Zickert A, Sundelin B, Svenungsson E, Gunnarsson I . Role of early repeated renal biopsies in lupus nephritis. Lupus Sci Med. 2014; 1(1):e000018. PMC: 4213828. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2014-000018. View