» Articles » PMID: 38648434

Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers DROL, PROS, SND, Hyperreflective Walls of Foveal Cystoid Spaces As Predictors of Central Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Intravitreal Ranibizumab

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Apr 22
PMID 38648434
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to establish DROL (disruption of retinal outer layers), PROS (photoreceptor outer segment length), SND (subfoveal neuroretinal detachment), and hyperreflective walls of foveal cystoid spaces (HRW) as optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers and predictors of central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR).

Methods: In this prospective, interventional study performed at a tertiary care center over a span of 1 year from December 2021 to December 2022, 50 eyes of 46 patients of DME were included. Visual acuity and spectral domain OCT imaging were performed at baseline. Using inbuilt calipers on SD-OCT, the horizontal extent of DROL and the vertical extent of PROS were measured manually. SND and HRW were assessed qualitatively. IVR was administered and patients were followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Results: The eyes without DROL had statistically significant (P < 0.05) lesser CMT and better BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity) (P < 0.05) after pro re nata injection of IVR. There was a positive correlation between the extent of baseline DROL with final CMT (P < 0.05) and final logMAR BCVA (P > 0.05), whereas negative correlation with the extent of baseline PROS with final CMT (P < 0.05) and final logMAR BCVA (P > 0.05). The presence of HRW and SND predicted non-resolution of CMT and worse visual acuity after treatment with IVR in DME.

Conclusion: DROL, PROS, SND, and hyperreflective walls of foveal cystoid spaces may be utilized as qualitative as well as quantitative biomarkers to predict the post-treatment CMT and visual acuity in DME.

References
1.
Eisma J, Dulle J, Fort P . Current knowledge on diabetic retinopathy from human donor tissues. World J Diabetes. 2015; 6(2):312-20. PMC: 4360424. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.312. View

2.
Eraslan S, Yildirim O, Dursun O, Dinc E, Temel G . Relationship Between Final Visual Acuity and Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Undergoing Anti-VEGF Therapy. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020; 50(3):163-168. PMC: 7338745. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.91962. View

3.
Maggio E, Sartore M, Attanasio M, Maraone G, Guerriero M, Polito A . Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema in a Real-World Clinical Setting. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 195:209-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.004. View

4.
Murakami T, Yoshimura N . Structural changes in individual retinal layers in diabetic macular edema. J Diabetes Res. 2013; 2013:920713. PMC: 3773460. DOI: 10.1155/2013/920713. View

5.
Otani T, Kishi S, Maruyama Y . Patterns of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127(6):688-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00033-1. View