» Articles » PMID: 38646557

Toward a New Personalized Psycho-social Approach for the Support of Prostate Cancer and Their Caregivers Dyads: a Pilot Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 22
PMID 38646557
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer patients (PCP) often struggle with a significant emotional, physical, and social burden during the care-flow pathway. Noteworthy, PCP should not be considered a standalone patient, but someone who is connected with a relevant social environment and that is usually supported by a beloved one, the caregiver. The involvement of the caregivers through the care pathway might bring significant benefits both on the psychological and the treatment and decision-making side. The present pilot study aimed at preliminarily assessing quantitatively the psychological impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis on the degree of agreement of PCPs and their caregivers on medical decisions, coping resources and psychological distress levels.

Methods: 16 PCP and their caregivers were enrolled in the study and fulfilled a battery of standardized questionnaires.

Results: Results showed low concordance in decision making styles and preferences in patients and their caregivers and that the dyads showed similar depression symptoms levels. Relevant features of the psychological needs of the analyzed dyads, such as need for information and support, also emerged.

Conclusion: On the basis of these preliminary results, guidelines for the construction of tailored brief psychological support interventions for PCP dyads are provided.

References
1.
Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M . The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 80(1):94-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. View

2.
Ilie G, Rendon R, Mason R, MacDonald C, Kucharczyk M, Patil N . A Comprehensive 6-mo Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program Decreases Psychological Distress Among Men Undergoing Curative Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2023; 83(6):561-570. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.009. View

3.
Grignoli N, Di Bernardo V, Malacrida R . New perspectives on substituted relational autonomy for shared decision-making in critical care. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1):260. PMC: 6182794. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2187-6. View

4.
Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug T, Neckelmann D . The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002; 52(2):69-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3. View

5.
Shin D, Cho J, Roter D, Kim S, Yang H, Park K . Attitudes Toward Family Involvement in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: The Perspectives of Patients, Family Caregivers, and Their Oncologists. Psychooncology. 2016; 26(6):770-778. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4226. View