» Articles » PMID: 38644878

Three-dimensional Measurements of Scapular Kinematics: Interrater Reliability and Validation of a Skin Marker-based Model Against an Intracortical Pin Model

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Apr 22
PMID 38644878
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A skin marker-based motion capture model providing measures of scapular rotations was recently developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity and the interrater reliability of the model. Shoulder range of motion (RoM) and activities of daily living (ADL) were tested in healthy volunteers with reflective markers on the scapula and thorax. To investigate the validity, the model was compared to simultaneous data collection from markers on a scapular intracortical pin. The interrater reliability was tested by comparing the skin marker-based protocol performed by two investigators. The mean root mean square error (RMSE) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)) were calculated to determine the validity and the interrater reliability, respectively. Eight subjects were included in the validity test: female/male = 2/6, mean (SD) age 35.0 (3.0) and BMI 23.4 (3.3). The mean RMSE of all scapular rotations ranged 2.3-6.7° during shoulder RoM and 2.4-7.6° during ADL. The highest errors were seen during sagittal and scapular plane flexions, hair combing and eating. The reliability test included twenty subjects: female/male = 8/12, mean (SD) age 31.4 (4.9) and BMI 22.9 (1.7). The ICC(2,1) for measuring protraction ranged 0.07-0.60 during RoM and 0.27-0.69 for ADL, for upward rotation the corresponding ICC(2,1) ranged 0.01-0.64 and 0.38-0.60, and anterior tilt 0.25-0.83 and 0.25-0.62. The validity and interrater reliability of the model are task dependent, and interpretation should be made with caution. The model provides quantitative measurements for objective assessment of scapular movements and can potentially supplement the clinical examination in certain motion tasks.

References
1.
Jackson M, Michaud B, Tetreault P, Begon M . Improvements in measuring shoulder joint kinematics. J Biomech. 2012; 45(12):2180-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.042. View

2.
Michaud B, Jackson M, Arndt A, Lundberg A, Begon M . Determining in vivo sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint centre locations from skin markers, CT-scans and intracortical pins: A comparison study. Med Eng Phys. 2016; 38(3):290-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.12.004. View

3.
Duprey S, Billuart F, Sah S, Ohl X, Robert T, Skalli W . Three-Dimensional Rotations of the Scapula During Arm Abduction: Evaluation of the Acromion Marker Cluster Method in Comparison With a Model-Based Approach Using Biplanar Radiograph Images. J Appl Biomech. 2015; 31(5):396-402. DOI: 10.1123/jab.2014-0244. View

4.
Prinold J, Villette C, Bull A . The influence of extreme speeds on scapula kinematics and the importance of controlling the plane of elevation. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 28(9-10):973-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.008. View

5.
Lefevre-Colau M, Nguyen C, Palazzo C, Srour F, Paris G, Vuillemin V . Kinematic patterns in normal and degenerative shoulders. Part II: Review of 3-D scapular kinematic patterns in patients with shoulder pain, and clinical implications. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017; 61(1):46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.09.002. View