» Articles » PMID: 38643310

Changes in Anti-Müllerian Hormone Values for Ovarian Reserve After Minimally Invasive Benign Ovarian Cystectomy: Comparison of the Da Vinci Robotic Systems (Xi and SP) and the Laparoscopic System

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Apr 20
PMID 38643310
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the impact on the ovarian reserve after minimally invasive ovarian cystectomy using two platforms, the Da Vinci robotic system (Xi and SP) and the laparoscopic system. Patients underwent laparoscopic or Da Vinci robotic (Xi or SP) ovarian cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022 at Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical center. We measured the change of AMH values (%) = [(postAMH - preAMH)] × 100/preAMH. No significant differences in preoperative age, cyst size, estimated blood loss during surgery, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, adhesion detachment rate and cyst rupture rate were observed. However, the operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than that in the robotic group (67.78 ± 30.58 min vs. 105.17 ± 38.87 min, p < 0.001) The mean preAMH and postAMH were significantly higher with the Da Vinci robotic group than with the laparoscopic group (preAMH: 5.89 ± 4.81 ng/mL vs. 4.01 ± 3.59 ng/mL, p = 0.02, postAMH: 4.36 ± 3.31 ng/mL vs. 3.08 ± 2.60 ng/mL, p = 0.02). However, the mean ΔAMH was not significantly different between two groups. ΔAMH also did not demonstrate significant differences among the three groups; laparoscopic, Xi and SP robotic. Even in the patient groups with preAMH < 2 and diagnosed with endometriosis, the ΔAMH did not show significant differences between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The Da Vinci robotic system is no inferior to conventional laparoscopic systems in preserving ovarian function.

References
1.
. Committee opinion no. 618: Ovarian reserve testing. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(1):268-273. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459864.68372.ec. View

2.
Goodman L, Goldberg J, Flyckt R, Gupta M, Harwalker J, Falcone T . Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215(5):589.e1-589.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.029. View

3.
Gomel V . Operative laparoscopy: time for acceptance. Fertil Steril. 1989; 52(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60779-3. View

4.
Restaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, Spina M, Marini G, Catena U . Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2020; 14(5):687-694. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y. View

5.
Maneschi F, Marasa L, Incandela S, Mazzarese M, Zupi E . Ovarian cortex surrounding benign neoplasms: a histologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169(2 Pt 1):388-93. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90093-x. View