» Articles » PMID: 38635973

Are People More Likely to Vape or Smoke Indoors? A Population Survey of Adults in England

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Apr 18
PMID 38635973
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasingly, people smoke cigarettes outdoors and avoid exposing bystanders to harm. People may not have the same motivation to vape outdoors since e-cigarettes, unlike cigarettes, do not create side stream emissions and exhaled aerosol contains fewer toxicants than secondhand smoke. This study aims to estimate the prevalence and correlates of vaping and smoking indoors among adults in England.

Aims And Methods: Data came from the Health Survey for England 2019, a cross-sectional household survey. Adults who vape or smoke (N = 1530) were asked whether they had vaped or smoked indoors inside the home, car, or other places within the past 7 days. Logistic regression was used to estimate prevalence and key correlates of indoor use, including age, sex, presence of adults/children in home, housing tenure, and nicotine dependence.

Results: People who exclusively vaped were much more likely to use their product indoors than those who exclusively smoked (87.0% vs. 52.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 6.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.09 to 9.28). Similarly, people who dual used had higher odds of vaping than smoking indoors (62.1% vs. 44.3%; OR = 3.76, 95% CI = 2.06 to 6.84). The preference for vaping over smoking indoors was found across different locations, including at home and in cars. Those who were older, highly dependent on nicotine, and lived alone were most prone to use any product indoors. While housing tenure was not strongly associated with vaping indoors, those living in social housing were much more likely to smoke indoors than homeowners.

Conclusions: Adults in England are much more likely to vape than smoke indoors. Age, nicotine dependence, and living alone are strongly associated with both behaviors.

Implications: Our results show that people have a strong preference for vaping over smoking indoors, including in the home. Given the high prevalence of vaping indoors, policy makers, landlords, and businesses must weigh up the ethics, benefits, and harms of extending smoke-free laws to include e-cigarettes.

Citing Articles

Secondhand Nicotine Absorption From E-Cigarette Vapor vs Tobacco Smoke in Children.

Tattan-Birch H, Brown J, Jackson S, Jarvis M, Shahab L JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2421246.

PMID: 38990571 PMC: 11240186. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21246.

References
1.
Bowker K, Orton S, Cooper S, Naughton F, Whitemore R, Lewis S . Views on and experiences of electronic cigarettes: a qualitative study of women who are pregnant or have recently given birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):233. PMC: 6003107. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1856-4. View

2.
Burton A . Does the smoke ever really clear? Thirdhand smoke exposure raises new concerns. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(2):A70-4. PMC: 3040625. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.119-a70. View

3.
Howe C, Cole S, Westreich D, Greenland S, Napravnik S, Eron Jr J . Splines for trend analysis and continuous confounder control. Epidemiology. 2011; 22(6):874-5. PMC: 3192444. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823029dd. View

4.
Tattan-Birch H . Commentary on Staff et al.: Should smoke-free areas be made vape-free?. Addiction. 2023; 119(1):84-85. DOI: 10.1111/add.16389. View

5.
Azagba S, Latham K, Shan L . Exposure to secondhand smoke in vehicles among Canadian adolescents: Years after the adoption of smoke-free car laws. Addict Behav Rep. 2019; 10:100215. PMC: 6726844. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100215. View