» Articles » PMID: 38632580

Laser Therapy Decreases Oral Leukoplakia Recurrence and Boosts Patient Comfort: a Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Apr 17
PMID 38632580
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oral leukoplakia (OLK) is a prevalent precancerous lesion with limited non-pharmacological treatment options. Surgery and various lasers are the mainstay of treatment; however, their relative efficacy and optimal choice remain unclear. This first network meta-analysis compared the effects of different lasers and surgical excision on post-treatment recurrence and comfort in OLK patients.

Methods: We searched four databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April 2023. The primary outcome was post-treatment recurrence, and secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative pain scores. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the study quality. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were employed to determine efficacy and identify the optimal intervention.

Results: A total of 11 RCTs including 917 patients and 1138 lesions were included. Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment showed significantly lower recurrence rates compared to CO laser (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.18), CO laser with margin extension (OR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01-0.60), Er:YAG laser (OR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03-0.37), electrocautery (OR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.18), and standard care (OR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.33). Er,Cr:YSGG laser also ranked the best for reducing recurrence, followed by standard care and CO laser combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT). Er:YAG and Er:Cr:YSGG lasers minimized bleeding and pain, respectively. None of the interventions caused severe adverse effects.

Conclusion: For non-homogeneous OLK, Er:YAG, Er:Cr:YSGG, and CO laser combined with PDT offer promising alternatives to surgical excision, potentially reducing recurrence and improving patient comfort. Further high-quality RCTs are necessary to confirm these findings and determine the optimal laser-PDT combination for OLK treatment.

References
1.
Seitidis G, Nikolakopoulos S, Hennessy E, Tanner-Smith E, Mavridis D . Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence. Prev Sci. 2021; 23(3):415-424. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01289-6. View

2.
Malekafzali B, Asnaashari M, Javadi F . Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary canine teeth prepared with high-speed diamond bur, Er:YAG laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Laser Ther. 2017; 26(3):195-202. PMC: 5675910. DOI: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-15. View

3.
de Pauli Paglioni M, Migliorati C, Faustino I, Mariz B, Roza A, Vargas P . Laser excision of oral leukoplakia: Does it affect recurrence and malignant transformation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2020; 109:104850. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104850. View

4.
Martimbianco A, Sa K, Santos G, Santos E, Pacheco R, Riera R . Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023; 69(3):469-472. PMC: 10004297. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221593. View

5.
Foy J, Bertolus C, Saintigny P . Oral cancer prevention worldwide: Challenges and perspectives. Oral Oncol. 2019; 88:91-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.008. View