Linking Genetic Counseling Communication Skills to Patient Outcomes and Experiences Using a Community-engagement and Provider-engagement Approach: Research Protocol for the GC-PRO Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Apr 17

PMID 38631834

Authors

Elena R Fisher

Deborah Cragun

Robert F Dedrick

Crystal Y Lumpkins

Mariana Ramirez

Kimberly A Kaphingst

Ashley Petersen

Ian M MacFarlane

Krista Redlinger-Grosse

Abdirashid Shire

Kathleen A Culhane-Pera

Heather A Zierhut

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: In over 50 years since the genetic counseling (GC) profession began, a systematic study of GC communication skills and patient-reported outcomes in actual sessions across multiple clinical specialties has never been conducted. To optimize GC quality and improve efficiency of care, the field must first be able to comprehensively measure GC skills and determine which skills are most critical to achieving positive patient experiences and outcomes. This study aims to characterise GC communication skills using a novel and pragmatic measure and link variations in communication skills to patient-reported outcomes, across clinical specialties and with patients from diverse backgrounds in the USA. Our community-engagement and provider-engagement approach is crucial to develop recommendations for quality, culturally informed GC care, which are greatly needed to improve GC practice.

Methods And Analysis: A mixed methods, sequential explanatory design will be used to collect and analyze: audio-recorded GC sessions in cancer, cardiac, and prenatal/reproductive genetic indications; pre-visit and post-visit quantitative surveys capturing patient experiences and outcomes and post-visit qualitative interview data. A novel, practical checklist will measure GC communication skills. Coincidence analysis will identify patterns of GC skills that are consistent with high scores on patient-reported measures. Two-level, multilevel models will be used to evaluate how GC communication skills and other session/patient characteristics predict patient-reported outcomes. Four community advisory boards (CABs) and a genetic counselor advisory board will inform the study design and analysis.

Ethics And Dissemination: This study has been approved by the single Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota. This research poses no greater than minimal risk to participants. Results from this study will be shared through national and international conferences and through community-based dissemination as guided by the study's CABs. A lay summary will also be disseminated to all participants.

References

Greenberg S, Boothe E, Delaney C, Noss R, Cohen S . Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models in the United States: Assessment of changes in use from 2010 to 2017. J Genet Couns. 2020; 29(6):1126-1141. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1265. View

Channaoui N, Bui K, Mittman I . Efforts of diversity and inclusion, cultural competency, and equity in the genetic counseling profession: A snapshot and reflection. J Genet Couns. 2020; 29(2):166-181. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1241. View

Plamann K, McCarthy Veach P, LeRoy B, MacFarlane I, Petzel S, Zierhut H . Effects of monitoring versus blunting on the public's preferences for information in a hypothetical cancer diagnosis scenario. J Genet Couns. 2020; 30(1):132-143. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1302. View

Chavez-Yenter D, Goodman M, Chen Y, Chu X, Bradshaw R, Lorenz Chambers R . Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(10):e2234574. PMC: 9533178. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34574. View

Redlinger-Grosse K, McCarthy Veach P, Cohen S, LeRoy B, MacFarlane I, Zierhut H . Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model. J Genet Couns. 2015; 25(2):239-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2. View

Chavez-Yenter D, Zhao J, Ratcliff C, Kehoe K, Blumling A, Peterson E . Theory utilization in current communication of cancer genetic testing research: Identified gaps and opportunities. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 282:114144. PMC: 8723834. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114144. View

Stoll K, Kubendran S, Cohen S . The past, present and future of service delivery in genetic counseling: Keeping up in the era of precision medicine. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018; 178(1):24-37. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31602. View

Israel B, Coombe C, Cheezum R, Schulz A, McGranaghan R, Lichtenstein R . Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11):2094-102. PMC: 2951933. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506. View

Lumpkins C, Nelson R, Twizele Z, Ramirez M, Kimminau K, Philp A . Communicating risk and the landscape of cancer prevention - an exploratory study that examines perceptions of cancer-related genetic counseling and testing among African Americans and Latinos in the Midwest. J Community Genet. 2023; 14(2):121-133. PMC: 10021032. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00629-5. View

10.

Formagini T, Teruel Camargo J, Perales-Puchalt J, Drees B, Fracachan Cabrera M, Ramirez M . A culturally and linguistically adapted text-message Diabetes Prevention Program for Latinos: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness. Transl Behav Med. 2023; 14(2):138-147. PMC: 11491928. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad053. View

11.

Cragun D, Zierhut H . Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017; 27(1):33-58. PMC: 5796847. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0145-0. View

12.

Hehmeyer K, Zierhut H, Dedrick R, Dean M, Schwarting K, Bellia K . The development and preliminary evaluation of the Genetic Counseling Skills Checklist. J Genet Couns. 2023; 33(3):578-591. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1758. View

13.

Joseph G, Lee R, Pasick R, Guerra C, Schillinger D, Rubin S . Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication. Eur J Med Genet. 2018; 62(5):357-367. PMC: 7213493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.004. View

14.

Southwick S, Esch R, Gasser R, Cragun D, Redlinger-Grosse K, Marsalis S . Racial and ethnic differences in genetic counseling experiences and outcomes in the United States: A systematic review. J Genet Couns. 2020; 29(2):147-165. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1230. View

15.

Zale A, Zierhut H, Dean M, Berry D, Racobaldo M, Cragun D . Revising the FOCUS framework through a qualitative study assessing self-reported counseling skills of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. 2022; 31(4):868-886. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1557. View

16.

Roter D, Ellington L, Erby L, Larson S, Dudley W . The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2006; 142C(4):209-20. PMC: 2766799. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30094. View

17.

Jensen J, Carcioppolo N, King A, Scherr C, Jones C, Niederdieppe J . The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 94(1):90-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016. View

18.

Cartujano-Barrera F, Cox L, Arana-Chicas E, Ramirez M, Perales-Puchalt J, Valera P . Feasibility and Acceptability of a Culturally- and Linguistically-Adapted Smoking Cessation Text Messaging Intervention for Latino Smokers. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:269. PMC: 7344180. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00269. View

19.

Athens B, Caldwell S, Umstead K, Connors P, Brenna E, Biesecker B . A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017; 26(5):902-933. PMC: 7350655. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y. View

20.

Redlinger-Grosse K, McCarthy Veach P, LeRoy B, Zierhut H . Elaboration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Qualitative Investigation of Goals and Strategies. J Genet Couns. 2017; 26(6):1372-1387. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0114-7. View