» Articles » PMID: 38630273

Metronome-guided Cochlear Implantation for Slower and Smoother Insertions of Lateral Wall Electrodes

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 17
PMID 38630273
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Achieving a slow and smooth electrode array insertion is paramount for preserving structural and functional integrity during cochlear implantation. This controlled study evaluates the efficacy of a metronome-guided insertion technique in enhancing the smoothness and speed of electrode array insertions.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study, patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery between 2022 and 2023 with lateral wall electrode arrays were included. Metronome guidance was delivered through an acoustic signal via headphones during electrode array insertion in cochlear implantation and compared to a control group without metronome-guidance.

Results: In total, 37 cases were evaluated, including 25 conventional insertions and 12 metronome-guided insertions. The results indicate that metronome-guided insertions were significantly slower (- 0.46 mm/s; p < 0.001) without extending the overall procedure time. This can be attributed to fewer paused sections observed in the metronome-guided technique. Moreover, metronome-guided insertions exhibited superior performance in terms of insertion smoothness and a reduced number of re-gripping events.

Conclusions: The findings support the recommendation for the systematic application of metronome guidance in the manual insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays, emphasizing its potential to optimize surgical outcomes.

References
1.
Torres R, Jia H, Drouillard M, Bensimon J, Sterkers O, Ferrary E . An Optimized Robot-Based Technique for Cochlear Implantation to Reduce Array Insertion Trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 159(5):900-907. DOI: 10.1177/0194599818792232. View

2.
Allingham E, Hammerschmidt D, Wollner C . Time perception in human movement: Effects of speed and agency on duration estimation. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020; 74(3):559-572. PMC: 8044617. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820979518. View

3.
Rajan G, Kontorinis G, Kuthubutheen J . The effects of insertion speed on inner ear function during cochlear implantation: a comparison study. Audiol Neurootol. 2012; 18(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1159/000342821. View

4.
Kaufmann C, Henslee A, Claussen A, Hansen M . Evaluation of Insertion Forces and Cochlea Trauma Following Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion. Otol Neurotol. 2020; 41(5):631-638. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002608. View

5.
Lin C, Chiu T, Chiou H, Chang C, Hsu C, Wu H . Residual hearing preservation for cochlear implantation surgery. Tzu Chi Med J. 2021; 33(4):359-364. PMC: 8532579. DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_181_20. View