» Articles » PMID: 38630258

Associations of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor with Toxicities and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We present a retrospective study of 67 patients with R/R B-ALL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, 41 (61.2%) patients received G-CSF (G-CSF group), while 26 (38.8%) did not (non-G-CSF group). Patients had similar duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia between the two groups. The incidences of CRS and NEs were higher in G-CSF group, while no differences in severity were found. Further stratified analysis showed that the incidence and severity of CRS were not associated with G-CSF administration in patients with low bone marrow (BM) tumor burden. None of the patients with low BM tumor burden developed NEs. However, there was a significant increase in the incidence of CRS after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS in patients who used G-CSF was longer. There were no significant differences in response rates at 1 and 3 months after CAR T-cell infusion, as well as overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that G-CSF administration was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS in patients with low BM tumor burden, but the incidence of CRS was higher after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS was prolonged in G-CSF group. G-CSF administration was not associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.

Citing Articles

Rapidly Manufactured CAR-T with Conserved Cell Stemness and Distinctive Cytokine-Secreting Profile Shows Improved Anti-Tumor Efficacy.

Tsao S, Gu M, Xiong Q, Deng Y, Deng T, Fu C Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39772010 PMC: 11680398. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121348.

References
1.
Fried S, Avigdor A, Bielorai B, Meir A, Besser M, Schachter J . Early and late hematologic toxicity following CD19 CAR-T cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019; 54(10):1643-1650. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0487-3. View

2.
Gardner R, Finney O, Annesley C, Brakke H, Summers C, Leger K . Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood. 2017; 129(25):3322-3331. PMC: 5482103. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-769208. View

3.
Lee D, Kochenderfer J, Stetler-Stevenson M, Cui Y, Delbrook C, Feldman S . T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2014; 385(9967):517-528. PMC: 7065359. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61403-3. View

4.
Sachdeva M, Duchateau P, Depil S, Poirot L, Valton J . Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators. J Biol Chem. 2019; 294(14):5430-5437. PMC: 6462525. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.AC119.007558. View

5.
Clark O, Lyman G, Castro A, Clark L, Djulbegovic B . Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(18):4198-214. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.645. View