» Articles » PMID: 38630113

Important Scoring Systems for Assessing the Severity of COVID-19 Based on COVID-19-related Deaths in Wuhan, China

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Apr 17
PMID 38630113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of 21 deaths and evaluate potential factors affecting disease severity and mortality risk in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed clinical data of 21 patients who died owing to COVID-19. Disease severity and mortality risk were assessed using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA); multilobular infiltration, hypo-lymphocytosis, bacterial coinfection, smoking history, hypertension and age (MuLBSTA); and pneumonia severity index (PSI) scores.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 66 ± 14 years and 15 (71.4%) patients were men. Sixteen (76.2%) patients had chronic medical illnesses. Twelve (57.1%) patients were overweight. Decreased lymphocyte proportions were observed in 17 (81.0%) patients on admission. Elevated D-dimer levels were observed in 11 (52.4%) patients, and the levels significantly increased when pneumonia deteriorated. The initial APACHE II and SOFA scores demonstrated that 18 (85.7%) and 13 (61.9%) patients, respectively, were in the middle-risk level. MuLBSTA and PSI scores after admission were associated with higher risks of mortality in 13 (61.9%) patients. Most patients developed organ failure and subsequently died.

Conclusions: Older, overweight, male patients with a history of chronic illnesses and continuously decreased lymphocyte proportions and increased D-dimer levels might have higher risks of death owing to COVID-19. The combination of general scoring (SOFA) and pneumonia-specific scoring (MuLBSTA and PSI) systems after admission might be sensitive in assessing the mortality risk of patients with COVID-19 who are in critical condition.

References
1.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J . Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020; 323(11):1061-1069. PMC: 7042881. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. View

2.
Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J . Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(18):1708-1720. PMC: 7092819. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. View

3.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z . Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10229):1054-1062. PMC: 7270627. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. View

4.
Channappanavar R, Fett C, Mack M, Ten Eyck P, Meyerholz D, Perlman S . Sex-Based Differences in Susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. J Immunol. 2017; 198(10):4046-4053. PMC: 5450662. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601896. View

5.
Gu J, Gong E, Zhang B, Zheng J, Gao Z, Zhong Y . Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J Exp Med. 2005; 202(3):415-24. PMC: 2213088. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20050828. View