The Dispositional Need for Cognitive Closure Indirectly Predicts Mock Jurors' Sentencing Decisions Through Right-wing Authoritarianism

Overview

Journal Psychiatr Psychol Law

Date 2024 Apr 17

PMID 38628246

Authors

Matthew P West

Logan A Yelderman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

One reason people are motivated to hold right-wing authoritarian beliefs is the need to manage uncertainty. Right-wing authoritarianism provides a stable source of black-and-white 'answers' about the social world - obey established authorities and norms and show hostility to deviants. Right-wing authoritarianism, in turn, is positively associated with more punitive attitudes and judgements. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mock capital jurors' need for cognitive closure and sentencing decisions through right-wing authoritarianism. Four-hundred and fifty-one jury-eligible adults read a hypothetical capital case, weighed aggravating and mitigating evidence and chose a sentence. They also responded to items measuring right-wing authoritarianism and the need for cognitive closure. The need for cognitive closure was indirectly related to choosing a death sentence through right-wing authoritarianism and the weighing of aggravators and mitigators. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as directions for future studies, are discussed.

References

Schafer J, Graham J . Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2):147-77. View

Van Hiel A, Pandelaere M, Duriez B . The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(7):824-37. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264333. View

Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

Peer E, Vosgerau J, Acquisti A . Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(4):1023-31. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y. View

Berryessa C . The potential influence of criminological rationales in considering childhood abuse as mitigating to sentencing. Child Abuse Negl. 2020; 111:104818. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104818. View

Buhrmester M, Talaifar S, Gosling S . An Evaluation of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018; 13(2):149-154. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617706516. View

Sibley C, Duckitt J . The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession. J Soc Psychol. 2013; 153(4):448-66. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2012.757544. View

Miller M, Bornstein B . The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials. Law Hum Behav. 2006; 30(6):675-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9056-6. View

Jost J, Glaser J, Kruglanski A, Sulloway F . Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(3):339-75. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339. View

10.

Sibley C, Duckitt J . Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. J Soc Psychol. 2009; 149(5):545-61. DOI: 10.1080/00224540903232308. View

11.

Lyle K, Grillo M . Why are consistently-handed individuals more authoritarian? The role of need for cognitive closure. Laterality. 2020; 25(4):490-510. DOI: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1765791. View

12.

Butler B, Moran G . The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law Hum Behav. 2002; 26(2):175-84. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014640025871. View

13.

Miley L, Heiss-Moses E, Cochran J, Heide K, Fogel S, Smith M . An examination of the effects of mental disorders as mitigating factors on capital sentencing outcomes. Behav Sci Law. 2020; 38(4):381-405. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2477. View

14.

Butler B, Moran G . The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behav Sci Law. 2007; 25(1):57-68. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.734. View

15.

Hauser D, Schwarz N . Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(1):400-7. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z. View

16.

Kruglanski A, Webster D, Klem A . Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993; 65(5):861-76. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.5.861. View

17.

Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard P, Savalei V . When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(3):354-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0029315. View

18.

Kruglanski A, Webster D . Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". Psychol Rev. 1996; 103(2):263-83. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263. View

19.

Bornstein B, Golding J, Neuschatz J, Kimbrough C, Reed K, Magyarics C . Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2016; 41(1):13-28. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000223. View

20.

Roets A, Van Hiel A . Separating ability from need: clarifying the dimensional structure of the Need for Closure Scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007; 33(2):266-80. DOI: 10.1177/0146167206294744. View