» Articles » PMID: 38625419

Prediction of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics: a Dual-center Study

Overview
Journal Discov Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 16
PMID 38625419
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The Gleason score (GS) and positive needles are crucial aggressive indicators of prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models in predicting GS and positive needles of systematic biopsy in PCa.

Material And Methods: A total of 218 patients with pathologically proven PCa were retrospectively recruited from 2 centers. Small-field-of-view high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and post-contrast delayed sequences were selected to extract radiomics features. Then, analysis of variance and recursive feature elimination were applied to remove redundant features. Radiomics models for predicting GS and positive needles were constructed based on MRI and various classifiers, including support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression (LR), and LR using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The models were evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic.

Results: The 11 features were chosen as the primary feature subset for the GS prediction, whereas the 5 features were chosen for positive needle prediction. LR was chosen as classifier to construct the radiomics models. For GS prediction, the AUC of the radiomics models was 0.811, 0.814, and 0.717 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. For positive needle prediction, the AUC was 0.806, 0.811, and 0.791 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively.

Conclusions: MRI radiomics models are suitable for predicting GS and positive needles of systematic biopsy in PCa. The models can be used to identify aggressive PCa using a noninvasive, repeatable, and accurate diagnostic method.

References
1.
Qiao X, Gu X, Liu Y, Shu X, Ai G, Qian S . MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Ki67 Expression and Gleason Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18). PMC: 10526397. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184536. View

2.
Mayer R, Simone 2nd C, Turkbey B, Choyke P . Prostate tumor eccentricity predicts Gleason score better than prostate tumor volume. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(2):1096-1108. PMC: 8739117. DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-466. View

3.
Popita C, Popita A, Andrei A, Rusu A, Petrut B, Kacso G . Local staging of prostate cancer with multiparametric-MRI: accuracy and inter-reader agreement. Med Pharm Rep. 2020; 93(2):150-161. PMC: 7243891. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1390. View

4.
Zhou C, Zhang Y, Guo S, Wang D, Lv H, Qiao X . Multiparametric MRI radiomics in prostate cancer for predicting Ki-67 expression and Gleason score: a multicenter retrospective study. Discov Oncol. 2023; 14(1):133. PMC: 10361451. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00752-w. View

5.
Yang Y . Comments on . Chin J Cancer Res. 2022; 34(5):456-457. PMC: 9646454. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.05.05. View