» Articles » PMID: 38624815

Discrimination in Lending? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Apr 16
PMID 38624815
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abstract: We assess the role of race in loans made through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The PPP program, created by the U.S. government as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic, provides loans to small businesses so they can keep employees on their payroll. We argue that the historical record and PPP program design choices made it likely that many Black-owned businesses received smaller PPP loans than White-owned businesses. Using newly released data on the PPP program, we find that Black-owned businesses received loans that were approximately 50% lower than observationally similar White-owned businesses. The effect is marginally smaller in areas with more bank competition and disappeared over time as changes to the PPP program were implemented allowing for entry by fintechs and other non-traditional lenders.

Plain English Summary: We find that Black-owned businesses received loans through the Paycheck Protection Program that were approximately 50 percent lower than White-owned businesses with similar characteristics. However, this difference in loan size shrank over time as more non-bank lenders such as fintechs were allowed to participate in the program and began approving PPP loans. Loan size differences were also slightly smaller in zip codes containing a larger number of bank branches. These results are consistent with prior research which shows lending discrimination by commercial banks against Black borrowers. It is also consistent with studies showing that greater access to and competition among banks and other lenders can reduce discrimination. In light of these results we recommend that policy makers account for existing racial inequalities within banking or other systems in their program design to produce more equitable outcomes.

Citing Articles

Keeping Race and Diversity Relevant in Medical Education.

Baugh A, Akgun K, Rusk A, Adelson V, Afolabi F, Crowder S Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024; 21(10):1365-1371.

PMID: 39078251 PMC: 11451892. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202403-322PS.


The Paycheck Protection Program and small business performance: Evidence from craft breweries.

Staples A, Krumel Jr T Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2024; :1-26.

PMID: 38625317 PMC: 9763080. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-022-00717-3.


Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses.

Belitski M, Guenther C, Kritikos A, Thurik R Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2024; 58(2):593-609.

PMID: 38624899 PMC: 8435174. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-021-00544-y.


From multiple streams to a torrent: A case study of food policymaking and innovations in New York during the COVID-19 emergency.

Ilieva R, Tomaino Fraser K, Cohen N Cities. 2023; 136:104222.

PMID: 36879669 PMC: 9977326. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104222.


Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) COVID-19 relief funding for veteran-, minority-, and women- owned dental businesses: A cross-sectional study.

Alpert E, Boynes S, Shaver A, Cothron A Front Oral Health. 2023; 3:1041415.

PMID: 36605754 PMC: 9809453. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2022.1041415.


References
1.
Couch K, Fairlie R, Xu H . Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment. J Public Econ. 2020; 192:104287. PMC: 7489888. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104287. View

2.
Humphries J, Neilson C, Ulyssea G . Information frictions and access to the Paycheck Protection Program. J Public Econ. 2020; 190:104244. PMC: 7441872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104244. View

3.
Granja J, Makridis C, Yannelis C, Zwick E . Did the paycheck protection program hit the target?. J financ econ. 2022; 145(3):725-761. PMC: 9409445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.05.006. View

4.
Fairlie R, Fossen F . The early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on business sales. Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2024; 58(4):1853-1864. PMC: 8009687. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-021-00479-4. View

5.
Shuai X, Chmura C, Stinchcomb J . COVID-19, labor demand, and government responses: evidence from job posting data. Bus Econ. 2020; 56(1):29-42. PMC: 7719850. DOI: 10.1057/s11369-020-00192-2. View