» Articles » PMID: 38622222

Morphological Diversity in True and False Crabs Reveals the Plesiomorphy of the Megalopa Phase

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Apr 15
PMID 38622222
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brachyura and Anomala (or Anomura), also referred to as true and false crabs, form the species-rich and globally abundant group of Meiura, an ingroup of Decapoda. The evolutionary success of both groups is sometimes attributed to the process of carcinization (evolving a crab-like body), but might also be connected to the megalopa, a specific transitional larval phase. We investigate these questions, using outline analysis of the shields (carapaces) of more than 1500 meiuran crabs. We compare the morphological diversity of different developmental phases of major ingroups of true and false crabs. We find that morphological diversity of adults is larger in false crabs than in true crabs, indicating that taxonomic diversity and morphological diversity are not necessarily linked. The increasing morphological disparity of adults of true and false crabs with increasing phylogenetic distance furthermore indicates diverging evolution of the shield morphology of adult representatives of Meiura. Larvae of true crabs also show larger diversity than their adult counterparts, highlighting the importance of larvae for biodiversity studies. The megalopa phase of Meiura appears to be plesiomorphic, as it overlaps between true and false crabs and shows little diversity. Causes may be common evolutionary constraints on a developmental phase specialized for transitioning.

References
1.
Haug C, Posada Zuluaga V, Zippel A, Braig F, Muller P, Grohn C . The Morphological Diversity of Antlion Larvae and Their Closest Relatives over 100 Million Years. Insects. 2022; 13(7). PMC: 9316203. DOI: 10.3390/insects13070587. View

2.
Rudolf N, Haug C, Haug J . Functional morphology of giant mole crab larvae: a possible case of defensive enrollment. Zoological Lett. 2016; 2(1):17. PMC: 5000411. DOI: 10.1186/s40851-016-0052-5. View

3.
Tsang L, Chan T, Ahyong S, Chu K . Hermit to king, or hermit to all: multiple transitions to crab-like forms from hermit crab ancestors. Syst Biol. 2011; 60(5):616-29. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr063. View

4.
Slack J, Holland P, Graham C . The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature. 1993; 361(6412):490-2. DOI: 10.1038/361490a0. View

5.
Wolfe J, Luque J, Bracken-Grissom H . How to become a crab: Phenotypic constraints on a recurring body plan. Bioessays. 2021; 43(5):e2100020. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100020. View