» Articles » PMID: 38615104

Deep Learning Evaluation of Echocardiograms to Identify Occult Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal NPJ Digit Med
Date 2024 Apr 13
PMID 38615104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) often escapes detection, given its frequent paroxysmal and asymptomatic presentation. Deep learning of transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs), which have structural information, could help identify occult AF. We created a two-stage deep learning algorithm using a video-based convolutional neural network model that (1) distinguished whether TTEs were in sinus rhythm or AF and then (2) predicted which of the TTEs in sinus rhythm were in patients who had experienced AF within 90 days. Our model, trained on 111,319 TTE videos, distinguished TTEs in AF from those in sinus rhythm with high accuracy in a held-out test cohort (AUC 0.96 (0.95-0.96), AUPRC 0.91 (0.90-0.92)). Among TTEs in sinus rhythm, the model predicted the presence of concurrent paroxysmal AF (AUC 0.74 (0.71-0.77), AUPRC 0.19 (0.16-0.23)). Model discrimination remained similar in an external cohort of 10,203 TTEs (AUC of 0.69 (0.67-0.70), AUPRC 0.34 (0.31-0.36)). Performance held across patients who were women (AUC 0.76 (0.72-0.81)), older than 65 years (0.73 (0.69-0.76)), or had a CHADSVASc ≥2 (0.73 (0.79-0.77)). The model performed better than using clinical risk factors (AUC 0.64 (0.62-0.67)), TTE measurements (0.64 (0.62-0.67)), left atrial size (0.63 (0.62-0.64)), or CHADSVASc (0.61 (0.60-0.62)). An ensemble model in a cohort subset combining the TTE model with an electrocardiogram (ECGs) deep learning model performed better than using the ECG model alone (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.79, p = 0.01). Deep learning using TTEs can predict patients with active or occult AF and could be used for opportunistic AF screening that could lead to earlier treatment.

Citing Articles

Top stories on using computational modeling and artificial intelligence to uncover arrhythmogenic mechanisms and advance arrhythmia management.

Trayanova N, Yin M, Prakosa A Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(11):2368-2369.

PMID: 39482040 PMC: 11534278. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.034.

References
1.
Svennberg E, Friberg L, Frykman V, Al-Khalili F, Engdahl J, Rosenqvist M . Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10310):1498-1506. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01637-8. View

2.
Duffy G, Cheng P, Yuan N, He B, Kwan A, Shun-Shin M . High-Throughput Precision Phenotyping of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy With Cardiovascular Deep Learning. JAMA Cardiol. 2022; 7(4):386-395. PMC: 9008505. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.6059. View

3.
Yuan N, Duffy G, Dhruva S, Oesterle A, Pellegrini C, Theurer J . Deep Learning of Electrocardiograms in Sinus Rhythm From US Veterans to Predict Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2023; 8(12):1131-1139. PMC: 10585587. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3701. View

4.
Sieweke J, Biber S, Weissenborn K, Heuschmann P, Akin M, Zauner F . Septal total atrial conduction time for prediction of atrial fibrillation in embolic stroke of unknown source: a pilot study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019; 109(2):205-214. PMC: 6989646. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01501-2. View

5.
Hart R, Pearce L, Aguilar M . Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(12):857-67. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007. View