» Articles » PMID: 38611102

MRI-Ultrasound Fused Approach for Prostate Biopsy-How It Is Performed

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 13
PMID 38611102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of MRI-ultrasound image fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in the face of an elevated serum PSA is now recommended by multiple societies, and results in improved detection of clinically significant cancer and, potentially, decreased detection of indolent disease. This combines the excellent sensitivity of MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer and the real-time biopsy guidance and confirmation of ultrasound. Both transperineal and transrectal approaches can be implemented using cognitive fusion, mechanical fusion with an articulated arm and electromagnetic registration, or pure software registration. The performance has been shown comparable to in-bore MRI biopsy performance. However, a number of factors influence the performance of this technique, including the quality and interpretation of the MRI, the approach used for biopsy, and experience of the practitioner, with most studies showing comparable performance of MRI-ultrasound fusion to in-bore targeted biopsy. Future improvements including artificial intelligence promise to refine the performance of all approaches.

References
1.
Robinson D, Abdulkareem R, Nasrollah D, Ljung A, Hintze P, Wallby S . Frequency of Biopsy and Tumor Grade Before vs After Introduction of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(8):e2330233. PMC: 10445184. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30233. View

2.
Siddiqui M, Ansbro B, Shah P, Aguiar J, Li E, Rich J . Real-world use of MRI for risk stratification prior to prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022; 26(2):353-359. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00543-4. View

3.
Bryant R, Yamamoto H, Eddy B, Kommu S, Narahari K, Omer A . Protocol for the TRANSLATE prospective, multicentre, randomised clinical trial of prostate biopsy technique. BJU Int. 2023; 131(6):694-704. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15978. View

4.
Siegel R, Giaquinto A, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74(1):12-49. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21820. View

5.
Watts K, Frechette L, Muller B, Ilinksy D, Kovac E, Sankin A . Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cognitive vs. image-guided fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2020; 38(9):734.e19-734.e25. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.020. View