Thermal Imaging for Burn Wound Depth Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Apr 13

PMID 38610828

Authors

Jesse de Haan

Matthea Stoop

Paul P M van Zuijlen

Anouk Pijpe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Implementing innovations emerging from clinical research can be challenging. Thermal imagers provide an accessible diagnostic tool to increase the accuracy of burn wound depth assessment. This mixed-methods implementation study aimed to assess the barriers and facilitators, design implementation strategies, and guide the implementation process of thermal imaging in the outpatient clinic of a burn centre. This study was conducted between September 2022 and February 2023 in Beverwijk, The Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews with burn physicians guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. Based on the barriers, implementation strategies were developed with the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool, and disseminated to support the uptake of the thermal imager. Subsequently, thermal imaging was implemented in daily practice, and an iterative RE-AIM approach was used to evaluate the implementation process. Common facilitators for the implementation of the thermal imager were the low complexity, the relative advantage above other diagnostic tools, and benefits for patients. Common barriers were physicians' attitude towards and perceived value of the intervention, the low compatibility with the current workflow, and a lack of knowledge about existing evidence. Six implementation strategies were developed: creating a formal implementation blueprint, promoting adaptability, developing educational materials, facilitation, conducting ongoing training, and identifying early adopters. These strategies resulted in the effective implementation of the thermal imager, reflected by a >70% among eligible patients, and >80% and . Throughout the implementation process, compatibility, and available resources remained barriers, resulting in low ratings on RE-AIM dimensions. This study developed implementation strategies based on the identified CFIR constructs that impacted the implementation of a thermal imager for burn wound assessment in our outpatient clinic. The experiences and findings of this study could be leveraged to guide the implementation of thermal imaging and other innovations in burn care.

Citing Articles

Strategies for Optimizing Acute Burn Wound Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.

Cretu A, Grosu-Bularda A, Bordeanu-Diaconescu E, Hodea F, Ratoiu V, Dumitru C Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859110 PMC: 11766551. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010128.

References

Norris E, Halaska C, Sachs P, Lin C, Sanfilippo K, Honce J . Understanding Patient Experiences, Opinions, and Actions Taken After Viewing Their Own Radiology Images Online: Web-Based Survey. JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(4):e29496. PMC: 9086874. DOI: 10.2196/29496. View

Jaspers M, Maltha I, Klaessens J, de Vet H, Verdaasdonk R, van Zuijlen P . Insights into the use of thermography to assess burn wound healing potential: a reliable and valid technique when compared to laser Doppler imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2016; 21(9):96006. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.096006. View

Proctor E, Powell B, McMillen J . Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:139. PMC: 3882890. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. View

Goel J, Nizamoglu M, Tan A, Gerrish H, Cranmer K, El-Muttardi N . A prospective study comparing the FLIR ONE with laser Doppler imaging in the assessment of burn depth by a tertiary burns unit in the United Kingdom. Scars Burn Heal. 2021; 6:2059513120974261. PMC: 7768866. DOI: 10.1177/2059513120974261. View

Hoeksema H, Van de Sijpe K, Tondu T, Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P . Accuracy of early burn depth assessment by laser Doppler imaging on different days post burn. Burns. 2008; 35(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.08.011. View

Damschroder L, Lowery J . Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013; 8:51. PMC: 3656778. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-51. View

Dang J, Lin M, Tan C, Pham C, Huang S, Hulsebos I . Use of Infrared Thermography for Assessment of Burn Depth and Healing Potential: A Systematic Review. J Burn Care Res. 2021; . DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab108. View

Jaspers M, Carriere M, Vries A, Klaessens J, van Zuijlen P . The FLIR ONE thermal imager for the assessment of burn wounds: Reliability and validity study. Burns. 2017; 43(7):1516-1523. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.04.006. View

Vousden N, Lawley E, Seed P, Gidiri M, Charantimath U, Makonyola G . Exploring the effect of implementation and context on a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial of a vital sign triage device in routine maternity care in low-resource settings. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):38. PMC: 6471783. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0885-3. View

10.

Southerland L, Hunold K, Van Fossen J, Caterino J, Gulker P, Stephens J . An implementation science approach to geriatric screening in an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021; 70(1):178-187. PMC: 8742753. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17481. View

11.

Heimbach D, Engrav L, Grube B, Marvin J . Burn depth: a review. World J Surg. 1992; 16(1):10-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02067108. View

12.

Ganon S, Guedon A, Cassier S, Atlan M . Contribution of thermal imaging in determining the depth of pediatric acute burns. Burns. 2019; 46(5):1091-1099. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.019. View

13.

Milton S, Emery J, Rinaldi J, Kinder J, Bickerstaffe A, Saya S . Exploring a novel method for optimising the implementation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction tool into primary care: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1):31. PMC: 9097304. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01205-8. View

14.

Singer A, Relan P, Beto L, Jones-Koliski L, Sandoval S, Clark R . Infrared Thermal Imaging Has the Potential to Reduce Unnecessary Surgery and Delays to Necessary Surgery in Burn Patients. J Burn Care Res. 2016; 37(6):350-355. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000330. View

15.

Waltz T, Powell B, Fernandez M, Abadie B, Damschroder L . Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):42. PMC: 6489173. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4. View

16.

Hassan S, Reynolds G, Clarkson J, Brooks P . Challenging the dogma: relationship between time to healing and formation of hypertrophic scars after burn injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2013; 35(2):e118-24. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31829b330a. View

17.

Pape S, Skouras C, Byrne P . An audit of the use of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in the assessment of burns of intermediate depth. Burns. 2001; 27(3):233-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(00)00118-2. View

18.

Glasgow R, Battaglia C, McCreight M, Ayele R, Rabin B . Making Implementation Science More Rapid: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Mid-Course Adaptations Across Five Health Services Research Projects in the Veterans Health Administration. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:194. PMC: 7266866. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00194. View

19.

Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. PMC: 2736161. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. View

20.

Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter C, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths C . Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017; 356:i6795. PMC: 5421438. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6795. View