» Articles » PMID: 38610180

Lumbo-Pelvic Rhythm Monitoring Using Wearable Technology with Sensory Biofeedback: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Apr 13
PMID 38610180
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As an essential lower-back movement pattern, lumbo-pelvic rhythm (LPR) during forward trunk flexion and backward return has been investigated on a large scale. It has been suggested that abnormalities in lumbo-pelvic coordination are related to the risk of developing low back disorders. However, considerable differences in the approaches used to monitor LPR make it challenging to integrate findings from those investigations for future research. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the use of wearable technology for kinematic measurement with sensory biofeedback for LPR monitoring by assessing these technologies' specific capabilities and biofeedback capacities and exploring their practical viability based on sensor outcomes. The review was developed following the PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was analyzed using the PREDro and STROBE scales. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEEXPLORE databases were searched for relevant studies, initially returning a total of 528 articles. Finally, we included eight articles featuring wearable devices with audio or vibration biofeedback. Differences in protocols and limitations were also observed. This novel study presents a review of wearable tracking devices for LPR motion-mediated biofeedback for the purpose of correcting lower back posture. More research is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of these devices, as well as their most appropriate corresponding methodologies.

Citing Articles

A review of concurrent sonified biofeedback in balance and gait training.

Zaferiou A, Hirsch Z, Bacani T, Dahl L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):38.

PMID: 40011952 PMC: 11866693. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01565-4.


The impact of biofeedback in enhancing chronic pain rehabilitation: A systematic review of mechanisms and outcomes.

Calderone A, Mazzurco Masi V, De Luca R, Gangemi A, Bonanno M, Floridia D Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e41917.

PMID: 39897804 PMC: 11783006. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41917.


Effectiveness of Sensors-Based Augmented Feedback in Ergonomics to Reduce Adverse Biomechanical Exposure in Work-Related Manual Handling-A Rapid Review of the Evidence.

Lind C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(21).

PMID: 39517873 PMC: 11548609. DOI: 10.3390/s24216977.


A Rapid Review on the Effectiveness and Use of Wearable Biofeedback Motion Capture Systems in Ergonomics to Mitigate Adverse Postures and Movements of the Upper Body.

Lind C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(11).

PMID: 38894134 PMC: 11175029. DOI: 10.3390/s24113345.

References
1.
Frasie A, Houry M, Plourde C, Robert M, Bouyer L, Roy J . Feedback for the prevention and rehabilitation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Work. 2023; 76(1):61-94. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-220545. View

2.
Maduri A, Pearson B, Wilson S . Lumbar-pelvic range and coordination during lifting tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007; 18(5):807-14. PMC: 2610367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.02.012. View

3.
Kim J, Campbell A, de Avila B, Wang J . Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37(4):389-406. PMC: 8183422. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y. View

4.
Alashram A, Annino G, Padua E . Robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review for the clinical effectiveness of Lokomat. J Clin Neurosci. 2021; 91:260-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.019. View

5.
Laird R, Keating J, Ussing K, Li P, Kent P . Does movement matter in people with back pain? Investigating 'atypical' lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain using wireless movement sensors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):28. PMC: 6339318. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2387-x. View