» Articles » PMID: 38609142

Macrolide Resistance Detection is Needed in University Settings

Overview
Journal Clin Med Res
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 12
PMID 38609142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

remains a difficult sexually-transmitted infection (STI) to manage due to its potential for antimicrobial resistance and post-infection sequelae. University students are especially vulnerable, as this demographic has the highest rate of STI in the United States. As a result, investigating prevalence rates and therapeutic outcomes in this population is essential to minimize future impact of The purpose of this study was to investigate a university student population for distribution and treatment outcome. Retrospective chart-review of university health clinic attendees, augmented by laboratory detection of following therapeutic intervention. A total of 1617 student encounters at a midwestern United States university health clinic over a 28-month interval from November 2017 through February 2020 were analyzed for and positivity rates and prevalence. Detection of these sexually-transmitted pathogens occurred by commercial RNA amplification testing. Chart review was focused on participant outcomes following initial detection and therapeutic intervention. positivity and prevalence rates were 7.05% and 9.00%, respectively, while analogous rates for were 7.05% and 6.51%, respectively. An average of 1.83 positive results was generated from participants infected with at any time, with an average of 1.17 positive results for ( < 0.0002). For students treated with azithromycin, 30.3% generated a negative result upon follow-up, with 1g daily and 2-day 500mg dosing regimens demonstrating less efficacy than a 4-day 250mg regimen or moxifloxacin. Data indicate a need for molecular macrolide resistance determination from primary specimens in the university setting.

Citing Articles

nucleic acid semi-quantitation and molecular macrolide resistance detection via automated assays: gender and specimen source considerations.

Munson E, Moore J, Krueger T, Zapp A, Lavey S, Munson K J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(6):e0048524.

PMID: 38785449 PMC: 11237506. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00485-24.

References
1.
Pond M, Nori A, Witney A, Lopeman R, Butcher P, Sadiq S . High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in nongonococcal urethritis: the need for routine testing and the inadequacy of current treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 58(5):631-7. PMC: 3922211. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit752. View

2.
Wood G, Jensen N, Astete S, Jensen J, Kenny G, Khosropour C . Azithromycin and Doxycycline Resistance Profiles of U.S. Mycoplasma genitalium Strains and Their Association with Treatment Outcomes. J Clin Microbiol. 2021; 59(11):e0081921. PMC: 8525566. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00819-21. View

3.
Jernberg E, Moghaddam A, Moi H . Azithromycin and moxifloxacin for microbiological cure of Mycoplasma genitalium infection: an open study. Int J STD AIDS. 2008; 19(10):676-9. DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008038. View

4.
Satterwhite C, Torrone E, Meites E, Dunne E, Mahajan R, Ocfemia M . Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013; 40(3):187-93. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53. View

5.
Bachmann L, Kirkcaldy R, Geisler W, Wiesenfeld H, Manhart L, Taylor S . Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium Infection, Antimicrobial Resistance Mutations, and Symptom Resolution Following Treatment of Urethritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71(10):e624-e632. PMC: 7744987. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa293. View