» Articles » PMID: 38607627

Semaglutide Vs Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 12
PMID 38607627
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Obesity is a disease with a large socioeconomic burden. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric procedure with wide global adoption. More recently, new weight-loss medications, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (eg, semaglutide), have attracted increased attention due to their efficacy. However, their cost-effectiveness over an extended period compared with ESG is a critical gap that needs to be better explored for informed health care decision-making.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide compared with ESG over 5 years for individuals with class II obesity.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy. The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9). The base case was a 45-year-old patient with class II obesity (BMI of 37). Patients undergoing ESG were subjected to risks of perioperative mortality and adverse events with resultant costs and decrement in quality of life.

Interventions: Strategies included treatment with semaglutide and ESG.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Costs (2022 US dollars), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A 5-year time horizon with a cycle length of 1 month with a 3% discount rate was used. Probabilities, costs, and quality-of-life estimates of the model were derived from published literature. One-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed.

Results: The model found that ESG was more cost-effective than semaglutide over a 5-year time horizon, with an ICER of -$595 532/QALY. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty added 0.06 QALYs and reduced total cost by $33 583 relative to semaglutide. The results remained robust on 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty sustained greater weight loss over 5 years vs semaglutide (BMI of 31.7 vs 33.0). To achieve nondominance, the annual price of semaglutide, currently $13 618, would need to be $3591.

Conclusions And Relevance: This study suggests that ESG is cost saving compared with semaglutide in the treatment of class II obesity. On price threshold analyses, a 3-fold decrease in the price of semaglutide is needed to achieve nondominance.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Revisional Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Deng J, Wool J, Montecino R, Arbaiza A, Xie L, Messiah S Obes Surg. 2025; 35(2):582-586.

PMID: 39775395 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07665-9.


Medical therapy to treat obesity and optimize fertility in women of reproductive age: a narrative review.

Duah J, Seifer D Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):2.

PMID: 39762910 PMC: 11702155. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01339-y.


Approaches to patients with obesity and CKD: focus on nutrition and surgery.

Bellizzi V, Annunziata G, Albanese A, DAlessandro C, Garofalo C, Foletto M Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(Suppl 2):51-64.

PMID: 39583144 PMC: 11581770. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae291.


IFSO Bariatric Endoscopy Committee Evidence-Based Review and Position Statement on Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity Management.

Abu Dayyeh B, Stier C, Alqahtani A, Sharaiha R, Bandhari M, Perretta S Obes Surg. 2024; 34(12):4318-4348.

PMID: 39482444 PMC: 11671576. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07510-z.


Editorial: Potentials and Pitfalls in Targeting Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) in the Management of Increasing Levels of Obesity.

Parums D Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e946675.

PMID: 39350608 PMC: 11453121. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946675.


References
1.
Campbell J, McGarry L, Shikora S, Hale B, Lee J, Weinstein M . Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastric banding and bypass for morbid obesity. Am J Manag Care. 2010; 16(7):e174-87. View

2.
Marso S, Bain S, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz F, Jodar E, Leiter L . Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(19):1834-1844. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. View

3.
Arterburn D, Tuzzio L, Anau J, Lewis C, Williams N, Courcoulas A . Identifying barriers to shared decision-making about bariatric surgery in two large health systems. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023; 31(2):565-573. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23647. View

4.
Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Riley C, Finkelstein E . Young adult weight trajectories through midlife by body mass category. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(9):1923-34. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20318. View

5.
Abu Dayyeh B, Bazerbachi F, Vargas E, Sharaiha R, Thompson C, Thaemert B . Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2022; 400(10350):441-451. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01280-6. View