Bracing in Severe Skeletally Immature Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does a Holding Strategy Change the Surgical Plan?

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Apr 12

PMID 38607405

Authors

Soren Ohrt-Nissen

M Heegaard

Thomas Andersen

M Gehrchen

B Dahl

N Tondevold

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the changes in flexibility during night-time bracing in skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with curves in the surgical range.

Materials And Methods: We included a consecutive cohort of 89 AIS patients with curves ≥ 45° and an estimated growth potential. All patients were eventually treated with fusion surgery, and all patients had side-bending radiographs prior to both bracing and surgery. Curves were classified as structural or non-structural curves according to Lenke at both timepoints.

Results: The main curve progressed by a mean of 12 ± 10° and the secondary curve by 8 ± 8°. Flexibility of the main curve decreased from 50 ± 19% to 44 ± 19% (p = 0.001) and the underlying curve from 85 ± 21% to 77 ± 22% (p = 0.005). In 69 patients (79%), the Lenke category did not progress during bracing. In 14 patients (15%), the progression in Lenke type occurred in the thoracic region (i.e., Lenke type 1 to type 2), while six patients (7%) progressed in the lumbar region (i.e., type 1 to type 3). In the 69 patients that did not progress, we found that the last touched vertebra moved distally by one or two levels in 26 patients.

Conclusions: This is the first study to describe that curve flexibility decreases during bracing in severe AIS. However, this had only a modest impact on the surgical strategy. Bracing as a holding strategy can be applied, but the risk of losing flexibility in the lumbar spine should be outweighed against the risks of premature fusion surgery.

References

Weinstein S, Dolan L, Wright J, Dobbs M . Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(16):1512-21. PMC: 3913566. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. View

Richards B, Bernstein R, dAmato C, Thompson G . Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(18):2068-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000178819.90239.d0. View

Ohrt-Nissen S, Luk K, Samartzis D, Cheung J . Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra?. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(8):2018-2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06398-4. View

Murphy R, Mooney 3rd J . The Crankshaft Phenomenon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017; 25(9):e185-e193. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00584. View

Fletcher N, McClung A, Rathjen K, Denning J, Browne R, Johnston 3rd C . Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012; 32(7):664-71. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824bdb55. View

DAmato C, Griggs S, McCoy B . Nighttime bracing with the Providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(18):2006-12. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00014. View

Cheh G, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Buchowski J, Daubs M, Kim Y . Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(20):2253-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e. View

Roberto R, Lonstein J, Winter R, Denis F . Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998; 17(6):718-25. View

Sanders J, Herring J, Browne R . Posterior arthrodesis and instrumentation in the immature (Risser-grade-0) spine in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(1):39-45. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199501000-00006. View

10.

Samdani A, Ames R, Kimball J, Pahys J, Grewal H, Pelletier G . Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: two-year results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(20):1688-93. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000472. View

11.

Baker C, Milbrandt T, Larson A . Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Early Results and Future Directions. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021; 52(2):137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.01.003. View

12.

Rushton P, Nasto L, Parent S, Turgeon I, Aldebeyan S, Miyanji F . Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis in the Skeletally Immature: Results of 112 Cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46(21):1461-1467. PMC: 8500278. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004061. View

13.

Raitio A, Syvanen J, Helenius I . Vertebral Body Tethering: Indications, Surgical Technique, and a Systematic Review of Published Results. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(9). PMC: 9099651. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092576. View

14.

Roser M, Askin G, Labrom R, Zahir S, Izatt M, Little J . Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform. 2023; 11(6):1297-1307. PMC: 10587225. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9. View

15.

Seleviciene V, Cesnaviciute A, Strukcinskiene B, Marcinowicz L, Strazdiene N, Genowska A . Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise Methodologies Used for Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, and Their Effectiveness: An Extended Literature Review of Current Research and Practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15). PMC: 9368145. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159240. View

16.

Qin X, Sun W, Xu L, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z . Selecting the Last "Substantially" Touching Vertebra as Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Lenke Type 1A Curve: Radiographic Outcomes With a Minimum of 2-year Follow-Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(12):E742-E750. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001374. View

17.

Ding R, Liang J, Qiu G, Shen J, Li Z . Evaluation of quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with different distal fusion level: a comparison of L3 versus L4. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 27(5):E155-61. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000073. View

18.

Ghandehari H, Ameri Mahabadi M, Mahdavi S, Shahsavaripour A, Seyed Tari H, Safdari F . Evaluation of Patient Outcome and Satisfaction after Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Scoliosis Research Society-30. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(2):109-13. PMC: 4468625. View

19.

Fischer C, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Boachie-Adjei O, Gupta M, Kim Y . Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra for Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2018; 6(3):250-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.002. View