» Articles » PMID: 38606399

Assessment of Reader Technologies for Over-the-Counter Diagnostic Testing

Overview
Publisher IEEE
Date 2024 Apr 12
PMID 38606399
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over-the-counter (OTC) diagnostic testing is on the rise with many in vitro diagnostic tests being lateral flow assays (LFAs). A growing number of these are adopting reader technologies, which provides an alternative to visual readouts for results interpretation, allowing for improved accessibility of OTC diagnostics. As the reader technology market develops, there are many technologies entering the market, but no clear, single solution has yet been identified. The purpose of this research is to identify and discuss important parameters for the assessment of LFA reader technologies for consideration by manufacturers or researchers. As part of The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering's Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) Tech program, reader manufacturers were interviewed to investigate the current state of reader technology development through several parameters identified as important industry standards. Readers were categorized by technology type and parameters including cost, detection method, multiplex capabilities, assay type, maturity, and use case were all assessed. Fifteen reader manufacturers were identified and interviewed, and information on a total of 19 technologies was assessed. Reader technology type was found to be predictive of other attributes, whether the reader is smart technology only, a standalone reader, a reader with smart technology required, or a reader with smart technology optional. Pairing reader technology with OTC diagnostic tests is important for improving existing COVID-19 tests and can be utilized in other diagnostics as the OTC use case grows in popularity. Reader technology type, which is predictive of core reader attributes, should be considered when selecting a reader technology for a specific LFA test within the context of regulatory guidance. As diagnostics increase in complexity, readers provide solutions to accessibility challenges, facilitate public health reporting, and ease the transition to multiplex testing, therefore increasing market availability.

Citing Articles

The Shift to Over-the-Counter Diagnostic Testing After RADx: Clinical, Regulatory, and Societal Implications.

Downing M, Broach J, Lam W, Manabe Y, Martin G, McManus D IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025; 6:237-240.

PMID: 39906263 PMC: 11793479. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3512189.


Miniaturized Devices for Isothermal Amplification and Photometric Quantification of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa.

Ramya Priya P, Dubey S, Goel S IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 6:133-139.

PMID: 39698119 PMC: 11655106. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3477315.

References
1.
Kaarj K, Akarapipad P, Yoon J . Simpler, Faster, and Sensitive Zika Virus Assay Using Smartphone Detection of Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification on Paper Microfluidic Chips. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12438. PMC: 6102244. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30797-9. View

2.
Saki E, Setiawan S, Wicaksono D . Portable Tools for COVID-19 Point-of-Care Detection: A Review. IEEE Sens J. 2022; 21(21):23737-23750. PMC: 8864949. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3110857. View

3.
Raj S, McCafferty D, Lubrasky G, Johnston S, Skillen K, McLaughlin J . Point-of-Care Monitoring of Respiratory Diseases Using Lateral Flow Assay and CMOS Camera Reader. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2022; 10:2800208. PMC: 9384958. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3193575. View

4.
Park J . Lateral Flow Immunoassay Reader Technologies for Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19). PMC: 9571991. DOI: 10.3390/s22197398. View

5.
Sohrabi H, Majidi M, Fakhraei M, Jahanban-Esfahlan A, Hejazi M, Oroojalian F . Lateral flow assays (LFA) for detection of pathogenic bacteria: A small point-of-care platform for diagnosis of human infectious diseases. Talanta. 2022; 243:123330. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123330. View