» Articles » PMID: 38605710

DNA Damage Response and Cell Cycle Regulation in Bacteria: a Twist Around the Paradigm

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Apr 12
PMID 38605710
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The co-protease activity in the RecA-ssDNA complex cleaves the autorepressor LexA, resulting in the derepression of a large number of genes under LexA control. This process is called the SOS response, and genes that are expressed in response to DNA damage are called SOS genes. The proteins encoded by the SOS genes are involved in both DNA repair and maintaining the functions of crucial cell division proteins (e.g., FtsZ) under check until the damaged DNA is presumably repaired. This mechanism of SOS response is the only known mechanism of DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation in bacteria. However, there are bacteria that do not obey this rule of DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation, yet they respond to DNA damage, repair it, and survive. That means such bacteria would have some alternate mechanism(s) of DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation beyond the canonical pathway of the SOS response. In this study, we present the perspectives that bacteria may have other mechanisms of DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation mediated by bacterial eukaryotic type Ser/Thr protein kinases as an alternate to the canonical SOS response and herewith elaborate on them with a well-studied example in the radioresistant bacterium .

Citing Articles

Surviving the storm: exploring the role of natural transformation in nutrition and DNA repair of stressed .

Sharma D, Soni I, Rajpurohit Y Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 91(1):e0137124.

PMID: 39651863 PMC: 11784314. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01371-24.

References
1.
Wang Y, Xu Q, Lu H, Lin L, Wang L, Xu H . Protease activity of PprI facilitates DNA damage response: Mn2+-dependence and substrate sequence-specificity of the proteolytic reaction. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0122071. PMC: 4374696. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122071. View

2.
Blanchard L, Guerin P, Roche D, Cruveiller S, Pignol D, Vallenet D . Conservation and diversity of the IrrE/DdrO-controlled radiation response in radiation-resistant Deinococcus bacteria. Microbiologyopen. 2017; 6(4). PMC: 5552922. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.477. View

3.
Mukherjee A, Cao C, Lutkenhaus J . Inhibition of FtsZ polymerization by SulA, an inhibitor of septation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(6):2885-90. PMC: 19664. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2885. View

4.
Kota S, Dhamodharan V, Pradeepkumar P, Misra H . G-quadruplex forming structural motifs in the genome of Deinococcus radiodurans and their regulatory roles in promoter functions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99(22):9761-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6808-6. View

5.
Rajpurohit Y, Misra H . Structure-function study of deinococcal serine/threonine protein kinase implicates its kinase activity and DNA repair protein phosphorylation roles in radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013; 45(11):2541-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.08.011. View