» Articles » PMID: 38604972

Risk Factors and Outcomes in Patients Who Switched from Peritoneal Dialysis to Physician-oriented or Patient-oriented Kidney Replacement Therapy

Overview
Journal Ren Fail
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2024 Apr 11
PMID 38604972
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare the cardiovascular events and mortality in patients who underwent either physician-oriented or patient-oriented kidney replacement therapy (KRT) conversion due to discontinuation of peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Methods: Patients with end-stage kidney disease who were receiving PD and required a switch to an alternative KRT were included. They were divided into physician-oriented group or patient-oriented group based on the decision-making process. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors related to KRT conversion in PD patients. The association of physician-oriented or patient-oriented KRT conversion with outcomes after the conversion was assessed by using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: A total of 257 PD patients were included in the study. The median age at catheterization was 35 years. 69.6% of the participants were male. The median duration of PD was 20 months. 162 participants had patient-oriented KRT conversion, while 95 had physician-oriented KRT conversion. Younger patients, those with higher education levels, higher income, and no diabetes were more likely to have patient-oriented KRT conversion. Over a median follow-up of 39 months, 40 patients experienced cardiovascular events and 16 patients died. Physician-oriented KRT conversion increased nearly 3.8-fold and 4.0-fold risk of cardiovascular events and death, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, physician-oriented KRT conversion remained about a 3-fold risk of cardiovascular events.

Conclusion: Compared to patient-oriented KRT conversion, PD patients who underwent physician-oriented conversion had higher risks of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Factors included age at catheterization, education level, annual household income, and history of diabetes mellitus.

References
1.
Liu F, Gao X, Inglese G, Chuengsaman P, Pecoits-Filho R, Yu A . A Global Overview of the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis First or Favored Policies: An Opinion. Perit Dial Int. 2014; 35(4):406-20. PMC: 4520723. DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00204. View

2.
Wang J, Zeng J, Liu B, Cai B, Li Y, Dong L . Outcomes after transfer from hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis vs peritoneal dialysis as initial therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Dial. 2020; 33(4):299-308. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12896. View

3.
Torreggiani M, Piccoli G, Moio M, Conte F, Magagnoli L, Ciceri P . Choice of the Dialysis Modality: Practical Considerations. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(9). PMC: 10179541. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093328. View

4.
Ahmadmehrabi S, Tang W . Hemodialysis-induced cardiovascular disease. Semin Dial. 2018; 31(3):258-267. PMC: 6023623. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12694. View

5.
Chen J, Zhong Z, Shi D, Li J, Li B, Zhang R . Association between monocyte count to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and mortality in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021; 31(7):2081-2088. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.014. View