» Articles » PMID: 38604249

Deep Learning for Predicting Progression of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Based on Lateral Knee Radiographs, Demographic Data, and Symptomatic Assessments

Overview
Journal Methods Inf Med
Publisher Thieme
Date 2024 Apr 11
PMID 38604249
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In this study, we propose a novel framework that utilizes deep learning and attention mechanisms to predict the radiographic progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) over a period of 7 years.

Material And Methods: This study included subjects (1,832 subjects, 3,276 knees) from the baseline of the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). Patellofemoral joint regions of interest were identified using an automated landmark detection tool (BoneFinder) on lateral knee X-rays. An end-to-end deep learning method was developed for predicting PFOA progression based on imaging data in a five-fold cross-validation setting. To evaluate the performance of the models, a set of baselines based on known risk factors were developed and analyzed using gradient boosting machine (GBM). Risk factors included age, sex, body mass index, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, and the radiographic osteoarthritis stage of the tibiofemoral joint (Kellgren and Lawrence [KL] score). Finally, to increase predictive power, we trained an ensemble model using both imaging and clinical data.

Results: Among the individual models, the performance of our deep convolutional neural network attention model achieved the best performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.856 and average precision (AP) of 0.431, slightly outperforming the deep learning approach without attention (AUC = 0.832, AP = 0.4) and the best performing reference GBM model (AUC = 0.767, AP = 0.334). The inclusion of imaging data and clinical variables in an ensemble model allowed statistically more powerful prediction of PFOA progression (AUC = 0.865, AP = 0.447), although the clinical significance of this minor performance gain remains unknown. The spatial attention module improved the predictive performance of the backbone model, and the visual interpretation of attention maps focused on the joint space and the regions where osteophytes typically occur.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the potential of machine learning models to predict the progression of PFOA using imaging and clinical variables. These models could be used to identify patients who are at high risk of progression and prioritize them for new treatments. However, even though the accuracy of the models were excellent in this study using the MOST dataset, they should be still validated using external patient cohorts in the future.

Citing Articles

Construction of a Clinical Prediction Model for Complications After Femoral Head Replacement Surgery.

Li K, Rong S, Li H J Clin Med Res. 2024; 16(11):554-563.

PMID: 39635335 PMC: 11614405. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr6047.

References
1.
Bayramoglu N, Nieminen M, Saarakkala S . Machine learning based texture analysis of patella from X-rays for detecting patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Int J Med Inform. 2021; 157:104627. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104627. View

2.
Kobayashi S, Pappas E, Fransen M, Refshauge K, Simic M . The prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24(10):1697-1707. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.05.011. View

3.
Roemer F, Guermazi A, Hunter D, Niu J, Zhang Y, Englund M . The association of meniscal damage with joint effusion in persons without radiographic osteoarthritis: the Framingham and MOST osteoarthritis studies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 17(6):748-53. PMC: 2740855. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.09.013. View

4.
Kim Y, Joo Y . Patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012; 24(4):193-200. PMC: 3526755. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.4.193. View

5.
Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P . Does isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis matter?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(9):1151-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.03.016. View