» Articles » PMID: 38603385

Developmental Evaluation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Practice-based Learnings from Projects in British Columbia, Canada

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Apr 11
PMID 38603385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, we explore experiences and learnings from adapting to challenges encountered in implementing three Developmental Evaluations (DE) in British Columbia, Canada within the evolving context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We situate our DE projects within our approach to the DE life cycle and describe challenges encountered and required adaptations in each phase of the life cycle. Regarding foundational aspects of DEs, we experienced challenges with relationship building, assessing and responding to the context, and ensuring continuous learning. These challenges were related to suboptimal embeddedness of the evaluators within the evaluated projects. We adapted by leveraging online channels to maintain communications and securing stakeholder engagement by assuming non-traditional DE roles based on our knowledge of the context to support project goals. Additional challenges experienced with mapping the rationale and goals of the projects, identifying domains for assessment, collecting data, making sense of the data and intervening were adapted to by facilitating online workshops, collecting data online and through proxy evaluators, while sharing methodological insights within the evaluation team. During evolving crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluators must embrace flexibility, leverage, and apply their knowledge of the evaluation context, lean on their strengths, purposefully reflect and share knowledge to optimise their DEs.

Citing Articles

Implementation of the Dementia Isolation Toolkit in long-term care improves awareness but does not reduce moral distress amongst healthcare providers.

Levy A, Grigorovich A, McMurray J, Quirt H, Ranft K, Engell K BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):481.

PMID: 38637814 PMC: 11027277. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10912-5.

References
1.
Gawaya M, Terrill D, Williams E . Using rapid evaluation methods to assess service delivery changes: Lessons learned for evaluation practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eval J Australas. 2022; 22(1):30-48. PMC: 8891248. DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211057630. View

2.
Santana F, Hammond Wagner C, Berlin Rubin N, Bloomfield L, Bower E, Fischer S . A path forward for qualitative research on sustainability in the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Sci. 2021; 16(3):1061-1067. PMC: 7816056. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00894-8. View

3.
Erskine K, Healey M . Conversations that count: Lessons from evaluating a men's digital mental health response during COVID-19. Eval J Australas. 2022; 22(1):18-29. PMC: 8891249. DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211053072. View

4.
Parker K, Karim A, Freeman R . Developmental Evaluation: six ways to get a grip on the potential of education scholarship to serve innovation. Can Med Educ J. 2021; 12(5):54-58. PMC: 8603884. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.71640. View

5.
Vindrola-Padros C, Chisnall G, Cooper S, Dowrick A, Djellouli N, Symmons S . Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19. Qual Health Res. 2020; 30(14):2192-2204. PMC: 7649912. DOI: 10.1177/1049732320951526. View