» Articles » PMID: 38601297

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma-a Rare Salivary Gland-type Tumor of the Breast: Are We Dealing with Primary or Secondary?-a Case Report and Literature Review

Overview
Journal Gland Surg
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Apr 11
PMID 38601297
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Salivary gland-like tumors are extremely unusual in the breast, and their histology is very similar to primary salivary gland neoplasms. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), a common salivary gland tumor, displays an infrequent occurrence in the breast, accounting for a mere 0.2-0.3% incidence. Given its rarity, it is critical to accurately distinguish it from metastatic cases before diagnosing it as a primary breast MEC for appropriate treatment. Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of MEC, and there is a paucity of literature highlighting the ideal treatment modality, especially for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancers. Therefore, the aim of our case report was to underscore the diagnostic process, surgical and adjunctive treatments for our patient with ER-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MEC while also conducting a literature review to contribute to the limited existing data.

Case Description: A 67-year-old African American woman presented with a lobulated 3.1-cm left breast mass on mammography, for which she underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy that revealed invasive carcinoma with squamous differentiation. The carcinoma was ER-positive, PR-negative and HER2-negative. Subsequently, she underwent a lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Her final pathology revealed an intermediate-grade MEC with negative lymph nodes. She had a past medical history of benign salivary gland tumor, as well as a family history of BReast CAncer gene 1 ()-associated breast cancer in her daughter.

Conclusions: MEC of the breast is a rare tumor with a relatively favorable overall prognosis. The early and precise diagnosis of this condition plays a pivotal role in formulating effective treatment strategies and ensuring positive survival rates. Nonetheless, future studies are recommended to further explore the role of surgical approaches and adjuvant therapy to improve treatment outcomes.

References
1.
Fisher E, Palekar A, Gregorio R, Paulson J . Mucoepidermoid and squamous cell carcinomas of breast with reference to squamous metaplasia and giant cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983; 7(1):15-27. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198301000-00002. View

2.
LUCHTRATH H, Moll R . Mucoepidermoid mammary carcinoma. Immunohistochemical and biochemical analyses of intermediate filaments. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1989; 416(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1007/BF01606314. View

3.
Basbug M, Akbulut S, Arikanoglu Z, Sogutcu N, Firat U, Kucukoner M . Mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a breast affected by burn scars: comprehensive literature review and case report. Breast Care (Basel). 2011; 6(4):293-7. PMC: 3225215. DOI: 10.1159/000331316. View

4.
Bak S, Choi H, Lee J, Na J, Choi D, Cho J . Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast: A case report and literature review focused on radiological findings. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(26):e29745. PMC: 9239627. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029745. View

5.
Sherwell-Cabello S, Maffuz-Aziz A, Rios-Luna N, Pozo-Romero M, Lopez-Jimenez P, Rodriguez-Cuevas S . Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast. Breast J. 2017; 23(6):753-755. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12819. View