» Articles » PMID: 38598436

Structural Bioinformatics Studies of Glutamate Transporters and Their AlphaFold2 Predicted Water-soluble QTY Variants and Uncovering the Natural Mutations of L->Q, I->T, F->Y and Q->L, T->I and Y->F

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Apr 10
PMID 38598436
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glutamate transporters play key roles in nervous physiology by modulating excitatory neurotransmitter levels, when malfunctioning, involving in a wide range of neurological and physiological disorders. However, integral transmembrane proteins including the glutamate transporters remain notoriously difficult to study, due to their localization within the cell membrane. Here we present the structural bioinformatics studies of glutamate transporters and their water-soluble variants generated through QTY-code, a protein design strategy based on systematic amino acid substitutions. These include 2 structures determined by X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, and 6 predicted by AlphaFold2, and their predicted water-soluble QTY variants. In the native structures of glutamate transporters, transmembrane helices contain hydrophobic amino acids such as leucine (L), isoleucine (I), and phenylalanine (F). To design water-soluble variants, these hydrophobic amino acids are systematically replaced by hydrophilic amino acids, namely glutamine (Q), threonine (T) and tyrosine (Y). The QTY variants exhibited water-solubility, with four having identical isoelectric focusing points (pI) and the other four having very similar pI. We present the superposed structures of the native glutamate transporters and their water-soluble QTY variants. The superposed structures displayed remarkable similarity with RMSD 0.528Å-2.456Å, despite significant protein transmembrane sequence differences (41.1%->53.8%). Additionally, we examined the differences of hydrophobicity patches between the native glutamate transporters and their QTY variants. Upon closer inspection, we discovered multiple natural variations of L->Q, I->T, F->Y and Q->L, T->I, Y->F in these transporters. Some of these natural variations were benign and the remaining were reported in specific neurological disorders. We further investigated the characteristics of hydrophobic to hydrophilic substitutions in glutamate transporters, utilizing variant analysis and evolutionary profiling. Our structural bioinformatics studies not only provided insight into the differences between the hydrophobic helices and hydrophilic helices in the glutamate transporters, but they are also expected to stimulate further study of other water-soluble transmembrane proteins.

Citing Articles

Structure Bioinformatics of Six Human Integral Transmembrane Enzymes and their AlphaFold3 Predicted Water-Soluble QTY Analogs: Insights into FACE1 and STEA4 Binding Mechanisms.

Chen E, Pan E, Zhang S Pharm Res. 2025; 42(2):291-305.

PMID: 39966220 PMC: 11880043. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-025-03822-6.


Structural bioinformatic study of six human olfactory receptors and their AlphaFold3 predicted water-soluble QTY variants and OR1A2 with an odorant octanoate and TAAR9 with spermidine.

Johnsson F, Karagol T, Karagol A, Zhang S QRB Discov. 2025; 6:e2.

PMID: 39944883 PMC: 11811853. DOI: 10.1017/qrd.2024.18.


Inhibitory Potential of the Truncated Isoforms on Glutamate Transporter Oligomerization Identified by Computational Analysis of Gene-Centric Isoform Maps.

Karagol A, Karagol T, Li M, Zhang S Pharm Res. 2024; 41(11):2173-2187.

PMID: 39487385 PMC: 11599315. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03786-z.


Molecular Dynamic Simulations Reveal that Water-Soluble QTY-Variants of Glutamate Transporters EAA1, EAA2 and EAA3 Retain the Conformational Characteristics of Native Transporters.

Karagol A, Karagol T, Zhang S Pharm Res. 2024; 41(10):1965-1977.

PMID: 39322794 PMC: 11530497. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03769-0.

References
1.
Dehury B, Tang N, Mehra R, Blundell T, Kepp K . Side-by-side comparison of Notch- and C83 binding to γ-secretase in a complete membrane model at physiological temperature. RSC Adv. 2022; 10(52):31215-31232. PMC: 9056423. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra04683c. View

2.
. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 51(D1):D523-D531. PMC: 9825514. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1052. View

3.
Carpenter E, Beis K, Cameron A, Iwata S . Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008; 18(5):581-6. PMC: 2580798. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.07.001. View

4.
Zhang S, Egli M . Hiding in plain sight: three chemically distinct -helix types. Q Rev Biophys. 2022; 55:e7. DOI: 10.1017/S0033583522000063. View

5.
Tegler L, Corin K, Pick H, Brookes J, Skuhersky M, Vogel H . The G protein coupled receptor CXCR4 designed by the QTY code becomes more hydrophilic and retains cell signaling activity. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21371. PMC: 7721705. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77659-x. View