» Articles » PMID: 38596802

Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools

Abstract

Background: Studies report various ways in which patients are involved in research design and conduct. Limited studies explore the influence of patient engagement (PE) at each research stage in qualitative research from the perspectives of all stakeholders.

Methods: We established two small research groups, a Patient Researcher-Led Group and an Academic Researcher-Led Group. We recruited patient research partners (PRP; = 5), researchers ( = 5), and clinicians ( = 4) to design and conduct qualitative research aimed at identifying candidate attributes related to patient preferences for tapering biologic treatments in inflammatory bowel disease. We administered surveys before starting, two months into, and post-project work. The surveys contained items from three PE evaluation tools. We assessed the two groups regarding the influence and impact each stakeholder had during the different research stages.

Results: PRPs had a moderate or a great deal of influence on the critical research activities across the research stages. They indicated moderate/very/extremely meaningful engagement and agreed/strongly agreed impact of PE. PRPs helped operationalize the research question; design the study and approach; develop study materials; recruit participants; and collect and interpret the data.

Conclusion: The three tools together provide deeper insight into the influence of PE at each research stage. Lessons learnt from this study suggest that PE can impact many aspects of research including the design, process, and approach in the context of qualitative research, increasing the patient-centeredness of the study. More comprehensive validated tools are required that work with a more diverse subject pool and in other contexts.

Citing Articles

Engaging people with lived experience of dementia in research meetings and events: insights from multiple perspectives.

Snowball E, Aiken C, Norman M, Hykaway W, Dempster Z, Itzhak I Front Dement. 2024; 3:1421737.

PMID: 39081602 PMC: 11285645. DOI: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1421737.


Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.

Bruce M, Yogaratnam K, Suryaprakash N, Barker K, Marshall D Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):52.

PMID: 38840143 PMC: 11155161. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00590-2.


Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study.

Marshall D, Suryaprakash N, Lavallee D, McCarron T, Zelinsky S, Barker K Patient. 2024; 17(4):379-395.

PMID: 38488995 PMC: 11189989. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00685-8.

References
1.
Abelson J, Tripp L, Kandasamy S, Burrows K . Supporting the evaluation of public and patient engagement in health system organizations: Results from an implementation research study. Health Expect. 2019; 22(5):1132-1143. PMC: 6803403. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12949. View

2.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

3.
MacLeod M, Leese J, Garraway L, Oelke N, Munro S, Bailey S . Engaging with patients in research on knowledge translation/implementation science methods: a self study. Res Involv Engagem. 2022; 8(1):41. PMC: 9358643. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00375-5. View

4.
Forsythe L, Heckert A, Margolis M, Schrandt S, Frank L . Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Qual Life Res. 2017; 27(1):17-31. PMC: 5770504. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1581-x. View

5.
Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A . Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015; 4(2):133-45. DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.79. View