» Articles » PMID: 38596433

Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Organic Infant Formula Compared to Traditional ‎infant Formula: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 10
PMID 38596433
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Infants' nutrition significantly influences their growth, development, and overall well-being. With the increasing demand for organic infant formula driven by the perception of health benefits and growing awareness of natural feeding options, it is crucial to conduct a comparative analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability between organic and traditional infant formulas.

Aim: To provide a concise and precise analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic infant formula compared to traditional infant formula. Due to limited direct comparisons, the review synthesizes available literature on each formula type, presenting insights into their potential effects on infants' digestive health.

Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted, compiling studies on organic and traditional infant formulas, their compositions, and reported effects on gastrointestinal tolerability. We searched academic databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar and specialized ‎nutrition, paediatrics, and infant health journals using relevant keywords till October 1, 2023. ‎.

Results: Although specific comparative studies are scarce and formula heterogeneity is a significant limitation, this systematic review provides an in-depth understanding of organic infant formulas' composition and potential benefits. While scientific evidence directly comparing gastrointestinal tolerability is limited, organic formulas strive to use carefully selected organic ingredients to imitate breast milk composition. Potential benefits include improved lipid profiles, higher methionine content, and decreased antibiotic-resistant bacteria levels. Understanding the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic and traditional infant formulas is crucial for parents and healthcare providers to make informed decisions.

Conclusion: Despite limitations in direct comparisons, this systematic review provides insights into the composition and potential benefits of organic infant formulas. It emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate their gastrointestinal effects comprehensively.

References
1.
Bongers M, de Lorijn F, Reitsma J, Groeneweg M, Taminiau J, Benninga M . The clinical effect of a new infant formula in term infants with constipation: a double-blind, randomized cross-over trial. Nutr J. 2007; 6:8. PMC: 1852321. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-8. View

2.
Jukes T . Organic food. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1977; 9(4):395-418. DOI: 10.1080/10408397709527241. View

3.
Savarino G, Corsello A, Corsello G . Macronutrient balance and micronutrient amounts through growth and development. Ital J Pediatr. 2021; 47(1):109. PMC: 8106138. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-021-01061-0. View

4.
Guo Y, Qiu T, Gao M, Ru S, Gao H, Wang X . Does increasing the organic fertilizer application rate always boost the antibiotic resistance level in agricultural soils?. Environ Pollut. 2023; 322:121251. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121251. View

5.
Bath S, Button S, Rayman M . Iodine concentration of organic and conventional milk: implications for iodine intake. Br J Nutr. 2011; 107(7):935-40. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511003059. View