» Articles » PMID: 38596274

An Exploratory Study of Sexual Aggression Tactics As a Function of Perpetrator Gender and Victim Gender

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Date 2024 Apr 10
PMID 38596274
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study sought to examine the association between perpetrator gender and victim gender and the use of sexually aggressive tactics (e.g., persistent enticement, verbal pressure, taking advantage of the inability to consent, and ignoring explicit non-consent). Participants were recruited from research panels to complete an online survey. They were asked to indicate which, if any, of 39 sexually aggressive tactics-representing four categories and nine subcategories-they had used to obtain sex, answering based on the gender with whom they most often have sex. Participants included 132 men who answered based on experiences with men (MSM), 131 men who answered based on experiences with women (MSW), 232 women who answered based on experiences with men (WSM), and 56 women who answered based on experiences with women (WSW). MSM were more likely than all other groups to use enticement and more likely than WSM to engage in explicitly nonconsensual sex. WSM were more likely than MSW and WSW to take advantage of their partner's impaired ability to consent. There was no difference among groups in use of verbal pressure. Gendered sexual stereotypes may contribute to the types of tactics used by men and women against men and women.

Citing Articles

Words Can Hurt: A Taxonomy of Verbally Pressured Sexual Exploitation in the SES-V.

Anderson R, Peterson Z, Canan S, Abbey A, McCauley H, Orchowski L J Sex Res. 2024; 61(6):882-896.

PMID: 38973062 PMC: 11232926. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2358414.


Different Components of Sexual Narcissism Are Differentially Associated With Specific Sexual Aggression Strategies: An Exploratory Study Among Male and Female College Students.

Uhlich M, Peterson Z, Li Y, Brown A, Han J, McBride J Int J Sex Health. 2024; 36(1):111-125.

PMID: 38596809 PMC: 10903577. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2311142.


Coercive Condom Use Resistance: A Scoping Review.

Davis K, Stewart R, Kirwan M, Chen W, Hammett J Psychol Violence. 2024; 13(5):361-373.

PMID: 38344250 PMC: 10857871. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000481.

References
1.
Peterson Z, Voller E, Polusny M, Murdoch M . Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men: review of empirical findings and state of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010; 31(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006. View

2.
DeGue S, DiLillo D, Scalora M . Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression. Sex Abuse. 2010; 22(4):402-26. DOI: 10.1177/1079063210372140. View

3.
Buday S, Peterson Z . Men's and Women's Interpretation and Endorsement of Items Measuring Self-Reported Heterosexual Aggression. J Sex Res. 2014; 52(9):1042-53. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2014.967373. View

4.
Krahe B, Berger A . Men and women as perpetrators and victims of sexual aggression in heterosexual and same-sex encounters: a study of first-year college students in Germany. Aggress Behav. 2013; 39(5):391-404. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21482. View

5.
Brousseau M, Hebert M, Bergeron S . Sexual coercion within mixed-sex couples: the roles of sexual motives, revictimization, and reperpetration. J Sex Res. 2011; 49(6):533-46. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2011.574322. View