Examining the Relationship Between International Digital Trade, Green Technology Innovation and Environmental Sustainability in Top Emerging Economics

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2024 Apr 10

PMID 38596034

Authors

Ying Wei

Xiaoyan Tao

Jiulong Zhu

Yuan Ma

Sijia Yang

Ayesha Ayub

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Ensuring preserving a sustainable environment is a crucial concern for individuals worldwide. In previous research, CO emissions have been used to measure environmental deterioration. However, in this study, we have expanded the scope to include carbon emissions and several other gases. This comprehensive measure is referred to as the ecological footprint (EFP). More significant international digital trade (IDT) has the potential to achieve several positive results, including reducing EFP (economic frictions and barriers), stimulating economic growth, and minimizing trade risk and volatility. These benefits can be realized by implementing structural reforms in significant production and development sectors. Green technology innovation (GTI) has the potential to make substantial progress in ecological quality and energy efficiency. Nevertheless, previous studies still need to adequately prioritize examining rising economies in terms of international trade diversification and GTI. This study examined the effects of IDT, GTI, and renewable energy consumption (REC) on EFP in BRICST countries. The study utilized data from the period between 1995 and 2022. The cross-sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) model demonstrates that EFP negatively correlates with trade diversification, REC, and GTI in the long and short term. These countries have demonstrated a significant presence of eco-friendly products in their trade portfolios, and their manufacturing processes are shifting towards GTI. The objective is to enhance the REC sources and minimize EFP from consumption. Conversely, the increasing economic growth within this economic group has a compounding impact on the environment's decline since it amplifies the carbon emissions from increased consumption. To reduce the EFP level, the paper suggests increasing investment in GTI, promoting worldwide digital trade, and embracing renewable energy sources.

Citing Articles

Impact of digital trade policy on regional carbon efficiency: a quasi-experimental study in China.

Ni L, Wen H, Ding X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28871.

PMID: 39572751 PMC: 11582560. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80564-2.

References

Xiong Q, Sun D . Influence analysis of green finance development impact on carbon emissions: an exploratory study based on fsQCA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 30(22):61369-61380. PMC: 8783589. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-18351-z. View

Feng Y, Wang X, Liang Z . How does environmental information disclosure affect economic development and haze pollution in Chinese cities? The mediating role of green technology innovation. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 775:145811. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145811. View

Li H, Ali M, Ayub B, Ullah I . Analysing the impact of geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty on the environmental sustainability: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023; 31(34):46148-46162. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26553-w. View

Wang J, Wang W, Ran Q, Irfan M, Ren S, Yang X . Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(7):9990-10004. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16381-1. View

Nureen N, Liu D, Irfan M, Isik C . Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a green innovation and environmental sustainability paradigm. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023; 30(21):59349-59365. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26675-1. View

Tang Y, Chau K, Fatima A, Waqas M . Industry 4.0 technology and circular economy practices: business management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(33):49752-49769. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19081-6. View

Mamkhezri J, Khezri M . Assessing the spillover effects of research and development and renewable energy on CO emissions: international evidence. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023; :1-30. PMC: 9969030. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03026-1. View

You Z, Li L, Waqas M . How do information and communication technology, human capital and renewable energy affect CO emission; New insights from BRI countries. Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e26481. PMC: 10901032. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26481. View

Du L, Razzaq A, Waqas M . The impact of COVID-19 on small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): empirical evidence for green economic implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 30(1):1540-1561. PMC: 9344445. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22221-7. View

10.

Sun Y, Li M, Zhang M, Khan H, Li J, Li Z . A study on China's economic growth, green energy technology, and carbon emissions based on the Kuznets curve (EKC). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 28(6):7200-7211. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11019-0. View

11.

Hu F, Qiu L, Xi X, Zhou H, Hu T, Su N . Has COVID-19 Changed China's Digital Trade?-Implications for Health Economics. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:831549. PMC: 8924300. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831549. View

12.

Zhou L, Ke Z, Waqas M . Beyond the Arena: How sports economics is advancing China's sustainable development goals. Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18074. PMC: 10368858. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18074. View

13.

Ming L, Gang L, Hua H, Waqas M . Modeling the influencing factors of electronic word-of-mouth about CSR on social networking sites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(44):66204-66221. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20476-8. View

14.

Mngumi F, Shaorong S, Shair F, Waqas M . Does green finance mitigate the effects of climate variability: role of renewable energy investment and infrastructure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(39):59287-59299. PMC: 8986026. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19839-y. View

15.

Safdar S, Khan A, Andlib Z . Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(55):82948-82965. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21401-9. View

16.

Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, Li L, Xie M . Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 746:140810. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810. View

17.

Gouda M, Bekhit A, Tang Y, Huang Y, Huang L, He Y . Recent innovations of ultrasound green technology in herbal phytochemistry: A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021; 73:105538. PMC: 8048006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105538. View

18.

Luo Y, Salman M, Lu Z . Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 759:143744. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143744. View

19.

Qiu S, Wang Z, Geng S . How do environmental regulation and foreign investment behavior affect green productivity growth in the industrial sector? An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data. J Environ Manage. 2021; 287:112282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282. View

20.

Yumei H, Iqbal W, Irfan M, Fatima A . The dynamics of public spending on sustainable green economy: role of technological innovation and industrial structure effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(16):22970-22988. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17407-4. View