» Articles » PMID: 38592300

Effect of Denosumab on Bone Health, Vascular Calcification, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 9
PMID 38592300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Osteoporosis is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients, contributing to cardiovascular risks. Limited research exists on denosumab's efficacy in this group. Our study explores denosumab's effects on bone turnover markers (BTMs) and vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) patients. : In a prospective single-center study, we investigated the effects of denosumab over 2 years on 30 HD patients from a cohort of 185. Annual assessments of bone mineral density (BMD), vascular calcification, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were conducted and compared with an untreated group. Mineral and bone parameters were analyzed at specific intervals in the treatment group. : Denosumab notably raised femoral BMD in the initial year. Most bone turnover markers (BTMs) decreased, except for osteocalcin. Changes in T50 correlated with BTMs. Pre-denosumab supplementation of calcium and vitamin D helped manage mineral imbalances. Post denosumab, parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels increased initially, stabilizing after 3 months. No significant changes occurred in vascular calcification or HRQL. : Denosumab exhibited varying effects on BMD improvement, with a stronger impact in the first year that diminished in the second year. Early PTH monitoring was crucial, and extending the administrative period may enhance BMD outcomes compared to the general population.

Citing Articles

Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Srisuwarn P, Eastell R, Salam S J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(4):264-278.

PMID: 39701107 PMC: 11658837. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.24.789.


Is denosumab an efficient and safe drug for osteoporosis in dialysis patients? Considerations and state of the art about its use in this setting.

Simonini M, Bologna A, Vezzoli G Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 56(10):3285-3293.

PMID: 38856936 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04110-9.

References
1.
Connelly K, Collister D, Tangri N . Fracture risk and treatment in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018; 27(3):221-225. DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000411. View

2.
Festuccia F, Jafari M, Moioli A, Fofi C, Barberi S, Amendola S . Safety and efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic hemodialysed patients. J Nephrol. 2016; 30(2):271-279. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-016-0334-1. View

3.
Makras P, Polyzos S, Papatheodorou A, Kokkoris P, Chatzifotiadis D, Anastasilakis A . Parathyroid hormone changes following denosumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013; 79(4):499-503. DOI: 10.1111/cen.12188. View

4.
PAYNE R, Little A, Williams R, Milner J . Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins. Br Med J. 1973; 4(5893):643-6. PMC: 1587636. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.4.5893.643. View

5.
Kim H, Kim A, Ro H, Chang J, Lee H, Chung W . Serum calcification propensity and its association with biochemical parameters and bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2022; 42(2):262-271. PMC: 10085723. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.22.059. View