» Articles » PMID: 38591980

Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis

Abstract

Endometriosis is a prevalent and potentially debilitating condition that mostly affects individuals of reproductive age, and often has a substantial diagnostic delay. US is usually the first-line imaging modality used when patients report chronic pelvic pain or have issues of infertility, both common symptoms of endometriosis. Other than the visualization of an endometrioma, sonologists frequently do not appreciate endometriosis on routine transvaginal US images. Given a substantial body of literature describing techniques to depict endometriosis at US, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to make recommendations aimed at improving the screening process for endometriosis. The panel was composed of experts in the imaging and management of endometriosis, including radiologists, sonographers, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. A comprehensive literature review combined with a modified Delphi technique achieved a consensus. This statement defines the targeted screening population, describes techniques for augmenting pelvic US, establishes direct and indirect observations for endometriosis at US, creates an observational grading and reporting system, and makes recommendations for additional imaging and patient management. The panel recommends transvaginal US of the posterior compartment, observation of the relative positioning of the uterus and ovaries, and the uterine sliding sign maneuver to improve the detection of endometriosis. These additional techniques can be performed in 5 minutes or less and could ultimately decrease the delay of an endometriosis diagnosis in at-risk patients.

Citing Articles

Ultrasound of the uterosacral ligaments: A reliability study for diagnosing endometriosis in Australian non-specialised medical imaging and radiology settings.

Maple S, Bezak E, Chalmers K, Parange N Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2025; 28(1):e12420.

PMID: 39975473 PMC: 11834895. DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12420.


Relationship Between Ultrasound Diagnosis, Symptoms and Pain Scale Score on Examination in Patients with Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis.

Maple S, Bezak E, Chalmers K, Parange N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598045 PMC: 11594915. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226901.


Comprehensive endometriosis care: a modern multimodal approach for the treatment of pelvic pain and endometriosis.

Mick I, Freger S, van Keizerswaard J, Gholiof M, Leonardi M Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2024; 18:26334941241277759.

PMID: 39376635 PMC: 11457249. DOI: 10.1177/26334941241277759.


Imaging anatomy of the lateral pelvic compartment applied to endometriosis.

Pontes Fernandez C, Oliveira B, Franco I, Matteoni-Athayde L, Ferreira I, Brandao A Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):936-952.

PMID: 39237820 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04541-z.

References
1.
Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M, Mol B, Condous G . Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of bladder deep endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 261:124-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.030. View

2.
Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha T, Guerra A . European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(7):2765-2775. PMC: 5486785. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z. View

3.
Harmsen M, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw R, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L . Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 60(1):118-131. PMC: 9328356. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24786. View

4.
. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of ultrasound of the female pelvis. J Ultrasound Med. 2014; 33(6):1122-30. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.6.1122. View

5.
Reid S, Condous G . Update on the ultrasound diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 209:50-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.040. View