» Articles » PMID: 38589557

Hallmarks of Sex Bias in Immuno-oncology: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 8
PMID 38589557
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sex differences are present across multiple non-reproductive organ cancers, with male individuals generally experiencing higher incidence of cancer with poorer outcomes. Although some mechanisms underlying these differences are emerging, the immunological basis is not well understood. Observations from clinical trials also suggest a sex bias in conventional immunotherapies with male individuals experiencing a more favourable response and female individuals experiencing more severe adverse events to immune checkpoint blockade. In this Perspective article, we summarize the major biological hallmarks underlying sex bias in immuno-oncology. We focus on signalling from sex hormones and chromosome-encoded gene products, along with sex hormone-independent and chromosome-independent epigenetic mechanisms in tumour and immune cells such as myeloid cells and T cells. Finally, we highlight opportunities for future studies on sex differences that integrate sex hormones and chromosomes and other emerging cancer hallmarks such as ageing and the microbiome to provide a more comprehensive view of how sex differences underlie the response in cancer that can be leveraged for more effective immuno-oncology approaches.

Citing Articles

A Novel Inflammation-Marker-Based Prognostic Model for Advanced Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma.

Chen X, Liu T, Mo S, Yang Y, Chen X, Hong S J Inflamm Res. 2025; 18:2433-2445.

PMID: 40008083 PMC: 11859127. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S502286.


Sex and outcomes of patients with microsatellite instability-high and V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Nasca V, Zhao J, Ros J, Lonardi S, Zwart K, Cohen R J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39929672 PMC: 11815414. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010598.


Immune-Mediated Liver Injury From Checkpoint Inhibitor: An Evolving Frontier With Emerging Challenges.

Dara L, De Martin E Liver Int. 2025; 45(2):e16198.

PMID: 39868913 PMC: 11771569. DOI: 10.1111/liv.16198.


Androgen receptor signalling in non-prostatic malignancies: challenges and opportunities.

Dotto G, Buckinx A, Ozdemir B, Simon C Nat Rev Cancer. 2024; 25(2):93-108.

PMID: 39587300 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00772-w.


Recipient-Donor Sex Constellation in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An ELTR Study.

Magyar C, Arteaga N, Germani G, Karam V, Adam R, Romagnoli R Liver Int. 2024; 45(1):e16178.

PMID: 39564600 PMC: 11669077. DOI: 10.1111/liv.16178.


References
1.
Haupt S, Caramia F, Klein S, Rubin J, Haupt Y . Sex disparities matter in cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021; 21(6):393-407. PMC: 8284191. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-021-00348-y. View

2.
Clocchiatti A, Cora E, Zhang Y, Dotto G . Sexual dimorphism in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016; 16(5):330-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2016.30. View

3.
Schafer J, Xiao T, Kwon H, Collier K, Chang Y, Abdel-Hafiz H . Sex-biased adaptive immune regulation in cancer development and therapy. iScience. 2022; 25(8):104717. PMC: 9307950. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104717. View

4.
Yang C, Jin J, Yang Y, Sun H, Wu L, Shen M . Androgen receptor-mediated CD8 T cell stemness programs drive sex differences in antitumor immunity. Immunity. 2022; 55(7):1268-1283.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.05.012. View

5.
Bayik D, Zhou Y, Park C, Hong C, Vail D, Silver D . Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets Drive Glioblastoma Growth in a Sex-Specific Manner. Cancer Discov. 2020; 10(8):1210-1225. PMC: 7415660. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1355. View