Psychological Flexibility and Cognitive-affective Processes in Young Adults' Daily Lives

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Apr 8

PMID 38589553

Authors

Marlon Westhoff

Saida Heshmati

Bjorn Siepe

Christoph Vogelbacher

Joseph Ciarrochi

Steven C Hayes

Stefan G Hofmann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Psychological flexibility plays a crucial role in how young adults adapt to their evolving cognitive and emotional landscapes. Our study investigated a core aspect of psychological flexibility in young adults: adaptive variability and maladaptive rigidity in the capacity for behavior change. We examined the interplay of these elements with cognitive-affective processes within a dynamic network, uncovering their manifestation in everyday life. Through an Ecological Momentary Assessment design, we collected intensive longitudinal data over 3 weeks from 114 young adults ages 19 to 32. Using a dynamic network approach, we assessed the temporal dynamics and individual variability in flexibility in relation to cognitive-affective processes in this sample. Rigidity exhibited the strongest directed association with other variables in the temporal network as well as highest strength centrality, demonstrating particularly strong associations to other variables in the contemporaneous network. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that rigidity in young adults is associated with negative affect and cognitions at the same time point and the immediate future.

References

Bond F, Hayes S, Baer R, Carpenter K, Guenole N, Orcutt H . Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011; 42(4):676-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. View

Levin M, Lillis J, Seeley J, Hayes S, Pistorello J, Biglan A . Exploring the relationship between experiential avoidance, alcohol use disorders, and alcohol-related problems among first-year college students. J Am Coll Health. 2012; 60(6):443-8. PMC: 3412304. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2012.673522. View

Epskamp S, Waldorp L, Mottus R, Borsboom D . The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018; 53(4):453-480. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823. View

Henry T, Robinaugh D, Fried E . On the Control of Psychological Networks. Psychometrika. 2021; 87(1):188-213. PMC: 9205512. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-021-09796-9. View

Fusar-Poli P, Solmi M, Brondino N, Davies C, Chae C, Politi P . Transdiagnostic psychiatry: a systematic review. World Psychiatry. 2019; 18(2):192-207. PMC: 6502428. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20631. View

Hayes S, Hofmann S, Stanton C, Carpenter J, Sanford B, Curtiss J . The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2018; 117:40-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005. View

Skinner B . Selection by consequences. Science. 1981; 213(4507):501-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.7244649. View

Hofmann S, Curtiss J, Hayes S . Beyond linear mediation: Toward a dynamic network approach to study treatment processes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020; 76:101824. PMC: 7137783. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101824. View

van de Leemput I, Wichers M, Cramer A, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F, Kuppens P . Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 111(1):87-92. PMC: 3890822. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312114110. View

10.

Hulbert-Williams N, Storey L . Psychological flexibility correlates with patient-reported outcomes independent of clinical or sociodemographic characteristics. Support Care Cancer. 2015; 24(6):2513-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-3050-9. View

11.

Shiffman S, Stone A, Hufford M . Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 4:1-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415. View

12.

Scheffer M . Complex systems: Foreseeing tipping points. Nature. 2010; 467(7314):411-2. DOI: 10.1038/467411a. View

13.

Cherry K, Hoeven E, Patterson T, Lumley M . Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021; 84:101973. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. View

14.

Hayes S, Hofmann S, Wilson D . Clinical psychology is an applied evolutionary science. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020; 81:101892. PMC: 7486990. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101892. View

15.

Liu Y, Slotine J, Barabasi A . Controllability of complex networks. Nature. 2011; 473(7346):167-73. DOI: 10.1038/nature10011. View

16.

Spiller T, Levi O, Neria Y, Suarez-Jimenez B, Bar-Haim Y, Lazarov A . On the validity of the centrality hypothesis in cross-sectional between-subject networks of psychopathology. BMC Med. 2020; 18(1):297. PMC: 7549218. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01740-5. View

17.

Gross J, Barrett L . Emotion Generation and Emotion Regulation: One or Two Depends on Your Point of View. Emot Rev. 2011; 3(1):8-16. PMC: 3072688. DOI: 10.1177/1754073910380974. View

18.

Faustino B . Transdiagnostic perspective on psychological inflexibility and emotional dysregulation. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020; 49(2):233-246. DOI: 10.1017/S1352465820000600. View

19.

Heshmati S, DavyRomano E, Chow C, Doan S, Reynolds K . Negative emodiversity is associated with emotional eating in adolescents: An examination of emotion dynamics in daily life. J Adolesc. 2022; 95(1):115-130. PMC: 9855302. DOI: 10.1002/jad.12103. View

20.

Hersh M, Ponder R, Hastings P, Rosenberg S . Adaptive mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli: two pathways of genome adaptation under stress. Res Microbiol. 2004; 155(5):352-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.020. View