» Articles » PMID: 38586913

Metabolomic Profiles in Patients with Cervical Cancer Undergoing Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Apr 8
PMID 38586913
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate endogenous metabolic changes before and after cisplatin and radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer via untargeted metabolomic analysis using plasma samples. A total of 13 cervical cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Plasma samples were collected from each patient on two occasions: approximately one week before therapy (P1) and after completion of cisplatin and radiation therapy (P2). Of the 13 patients, 12 patients received both cisplatin and radiation therapy, whereas one patient received radiation therapy alone. The samples were analyzed using the Ultimate 3000 coupled with Q Exactive Focus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation utilized a Kinetex C18 column 2.1×100 mm (2.6 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), and the temperature was maintained at 40°C. Following P2, there were statistically significant increases in the concentrations of indoxyl sulfate, phenylacetylglutamine, Lysophosphatidyethanolamine (LysoPE) (18:1), and indole-3-acetic acid compared with the concentrations observed at P1. Specifically, in the human papillomavirus (HPV) noninfection group, indoxyl sulfate, LysoPE (18:1), and phenylacetylglutamine showed statistically significant increases at P2 compared with P1. No significant changes in metabolite concentrations were observed in the HPV infection group. Indoxyl sulfate, LysoPE (18:1), phenylacetylglutamine, and indole-3-acetic acid were significantly increased following cisplatin and radiation therapy.

References
1.
Kihara Y, Mizuno H, Chun J . Lysophospholipid receptors in drug discovery. Exp Cell Res. 2014; 333(2):171-177. PMC: 4408218. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.11.020. View

2.
Holditch S, Brown C, Lombardi A, Nguyen K, Edelstein C . Recent Advances in Models, Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Interventions in Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(12). PMC: 6627318. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20123011. View

3.
Tan B, Chen J, Qin S, Liao C, Zhang Y, Wang D . Tryptophan Pathway-Targeted Metabolomics Study on the Mechanism and Intervention of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats. Chem Res Toxicol. 2021; 34(7):1759-1768. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00110. View

4.
Chen H, Zhang J, Zhou H, Zhu Y, Liang Y, Zhu P . UHPLC-HRMS-based serum lipisdomics reveals novel biomarkers to assist in the discrimination between colorectal adenoma and cancer. Front Oncol. 2022; 12:934145. PMC: 9366052. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.934145. View

5.
Bourmaud A, Gallien S, Domon B . Parallel reaction monitoring using quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer: Principle and applications. Proteomics. 2016; 16(15-16):2146-59. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500543. View