» Articles » PMID: 38585992

Preferences and Uptake of Home-based HIV Self-testing for Maternal Retesting in Kenya

Overview
Journal medRxiv
Date 2024 Apr 8
PMID 38585992
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare preferences, uptake, and cofactors for unassisted home-based oral self-testing (HB-HIVST) versus clinic-based rapid diagnostic blood tests (CB-RDT) for maternal HIV retesting.

Design: Prospective cohort.

Methods: Between November 2017 and June 2019, HIV-negative pregnant Kenyan women receiving antenatal care were enrolled and given a choice to retest with HB-HIVST or CB-RDT. Women were asked to retest between 36 weeks gestation and 1 week post-delivery if the last HIV test was <24 weeks gestation or at 6 weeks postpartum if ≥24 weeks gestation, and self-report on retesting at a 14 week postpartum.

Results: Overall, 994 women enrolled and 33% (n=330) selected HB-HIVST. HB-HIVST was selected because it was private (68%), convenient (63%), and offered flexibility in timing of retesting (63%), whereas CB-RDT was selected due to trust of providers to administer the test (77%) and convenience of clinic testing (64%). Among 905 women who reported retesting at follow-up, 135 (15%) used HB-HIVST. Most (94%) who selected CB-RDT retested with this strategy, compared to 39% who selected HB-HIVST retesting with HB-HIVST. HB-HIVST retesting was more common among women with higher household income and those who may have been unable to test during pregnancy (both retested postpartum and delivered <37 weeks gestation) and less common among women who were depressed. Most women said they would retest in the future using the test selected at enrollment (99% HB-HIVST; 93% CB-RDT-RDT).

Conclusions: While most women preferred CB-RDT for maternal retesting, HB-HIVST was acceptable and feasible and may increase retesting coverage and partner testing.

References
1.
Figueroa C, Johnson C, Ford N, Sands A, Dalal S, Meurant R . Reliability of HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing compared with testing by health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2018; 5(6):e277-e290. PMC: 5986793. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30044-4. View

2.
Heemelaar S, Habets N, Makukula Z, van Roosmalen J, van den Akker T . Repeat HIV testing during pregnancy and delivery: missed opportunities in a rural district hospital in Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2014; 20(3):277-83. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12432. View

3.
Kinuthia J, Richardson B, Drake A, Matemo D, Unger J, McClelland R . Sexual Behavior and Vaginal Practices During Pregnancy and Postpartum: Implications for HIV Prevention Strategies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016; 74(2):142-149. PMC: 5357239. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001225. View

4.
Nungu S, Mghamba J, Rumisha S, Semali I . Uptake and determinants for HIV postpartum re-testing among mothers with prenatal negative status in Njombe region, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):398. PMC: 6506942. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4062-8. View

5.
Pai N, Sharma J, Shivkumar S, Pillay S, Vadnais C, Joseph L . Supervised and unsupervised self-testing for HIV in high- and low-risk populations: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(4):e1001414. PMC: 3614510. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001414. View