» Articles » PMID: 38584176

Digital Setup Accuracy for Moderate Crowding Correction with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: a Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Prog Orthod
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Apr 7
PMID 38584176
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of a semi-automatic 3D digital setup process in predicting the orthodontic treatment outcome achieved by labial fixed appliances.

Subjects And Methods: Twenty-five adult patients (18 to 24 years old) with class I malocclusion and moderate crowding were prospectively enrolled and received treatment on both jaws through the straight-wire technique. Prior to treatment commencement, a semi-automatic digital setup simulating the predicted treatment outcome was performed for each patient through Orthoanalyzer software (3Shape®, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain the prediction model. This was compared to the final outcome model through 3D superimposition methods. Metric variables and inspection of color-coded distance maps were used to detect how accurately the digital setup predicts the actual treatment outcome.

Results: The mean absolute distances (MAD) between the superimposed dental arches of the predicted and the final models were: 0.77 ± 0.13 mm following superimposition on the palate, 0.52 ± 0.06 mm following superimposition on the maxillary dental arch, and 0.55 ± 0.15 mm following superimposition on the mandibular dental arch. The MAD at the palatal reference area was 0.09 ± 0.04 mm. Visualization of color-coded distance maps indicated that the digital setup accurately predicted the final teeth position in a few cases. Almost half of the cases had posteriorly wider upper and lower dental arches and palatally/lingually positioned or inclined anterior teeth, whereas the rest still showed errors within 2-3 mm, distributed over the entire dental arches with no distinct pattern.

Conclusions: The accuracy of semi-automatic prediction of the labial fixed appliance treatment outcome in Class I cases with moderate crowding is not yet sufficient. While average measures showed deviations less than 1 mm, examination of individual color-coded distance maps revealed significant disparities between the simulated and the actual results.

Citing Articles

Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular and condylar growth using artificial intelligence tools: a comparison of twin-block and Frankel II Appliances.

Shihabi R, Liu Y, Kusaibati A, Maraabeh F, Zhan J, Zhang J BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):254.

PMID: 39966790 PMC: 11837411. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05624-z.

References
1.
Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N . Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5838. PMC: 5517608. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06013-5. View

2.
Henninger E, Vasilakos G, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N . The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):10501. PMC: 6642138. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46887-1. View

3.
Pauls A, Nienkemper M, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D . Therapeutic accuracy of the completely customized lingual appliance WIN : A retrospective cohort study. J Orofac Orthop. 2016; 78(1):52-61. PMC: 5247553. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0058-9. View

4.
Im J, Cha J, Lee K, Yu H, Hwang C . Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(4):434-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.014. View

5.
Barreto M, Faber J, Vogel C, Araujo T . Reliability of digital orthodontic setups. Angle Orthod. 2015; 86(2):255-9. PMC: 8603624. DOI: 10.2319/120914-890.1. View